- This topic has 3 voices and 1 reply.
-
Posts
-
With the recent discussion here about the AFI Top 100 list, it made me wonder. What makes a movie good?Is it the quality of the storyThe quality of the acting (even if script is mediocre)The lasting effect it had (and still has) on the audience. regardless whether the acting/script was good or not (Jaws comes to mind, as do some of the epic movies)IMO, if the movie can "bring you there", then it's a good movie. (Alien should have made the list)
I think for the most part it's all about the story. This is why historical movies are so good – because there are so many good stories out there that have already been written since the beginning of civilization. These stories often contain universal truths or significant lessons or observations about the nature of humanity. In a sense, Hollywood may use historical scenarios as the basis for movies because these stories are tried and have stood the test of time. Look at the movie about Beowulf that is either now in theaters or will be imminently released.There are other things which add to the movie, but they can add to it if the story is there. Good acting is definitely a big one. There are some historical movies (or even non-historical ones) that I see where I question whether the actor playing a character is really from civilization as we know it. Special effects can make or break a movie. This comes into play more where within the sci-fi/fantasy genres. Costuming/makeup may come into play with historical movies, and these can add to or take from the movie's credibility. Cinematography is also significant as to what can be added to a movie. If it's not there you don't really miss it, but if good cinematography is present it certainly makes the movie much more memorable. Oh yeah, a great soundtrack truly does set the mood and adds much to the film as well. Braveheart's soundtrack, by James Horner, is one of the best I have ever heard. Of course, John Williams' Star Wars soundtrack is pretty high up there as well.
Good writing, that follows the original text (if it comes from a book). Dune, for instance, by Frank Herbert. A better historical novel (yes in its context, I think Dune can be called history – is not time realative?) is not to be found, but try, and a worm will find you. The movie did not ever compare to the richness of the novel. Rosemary's Baby gets my vote for the film that most closely follows the book, right down to much of the dialog.The director can't be left out of the equation for a good film.But basically, good for whom? The audience must be considered. Directors are attempting to deliver a message, at least that is what any director will attempt, but will actors be looking the other way? So all vacuous queries about film center about the director, and secondly, the directed actors.But, what makes a movie better? Lighting? Direction? Blueberry Pancakes? Right, the answer is lighting, along with lighting, and more better lighting. If one can't light the set ... well, give up, you hopeless weenies, pancakes formed around the blue berry will never happen here.
