One thing that I've found (and perhaps not the greatest of advice if you have really strict professors) is that as long as you have the appropriate information, and maybe as long as you're consistent in your use, you won't get into trouble. As you know there are competing formats and sometimes it's difficult to determine what exactly type of material you're dealing with. The bottom line is you need to present the pertinent information in regard to your source, and as long as you're doing it consistently I imagine you'd be fine for most classes. I had a professor once at the graduate level who didn't know what I was writing when I included "Ibid" in a footnote or endnote (I was coming from a liberal arts background). From what I recall she was like "what is this??" Turns out she wanted me to use "Id.", which I now know is the norm for that particular field of study. I've also found out that "Id." is an abbreviation for "Ibid"....talk about laziness when you need to abbreviate a four-letter word....lol.
Seeing this is a beginner class, I don't think he's going to be all that fussy as long as it's cited somehow.Funny thing is I asked him, gave him these examples and he said to check out this other website which still had no information about it (but I can properly cite a Senate hearing now!). However, he did ask "Location?"I'm going this route, or close to it:Field Manual (FM) 3-24/Marine Corps Warfighting Publication (MCWP) 3-33.5, Counterinsurgency (Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army and Headquarters, United States Marine Corps, December 2006).It doesn't look like "citing" the book (Univ of Chicago press) is the correct way to go. I checked out some papers on an Army writing website and this is how most of them did it.Now I guess for the in text citations I'd go (Field Manual I-64) or something like if I'm referencing something.
My biggest problem now is wittling down the 8 pages to 4 pages (as required) without losing structure. (And I haven't even done the conclusion yet. :P)I may have picked the wrong topic for such a short paper and might have to leave the military aspect out of it completely.
I remember an undergraduate theology professor of mine saying he used to do that where he'd write a paper longer than required and then be “forced” to shorten it to fit the max length requirement. It really helps you focus on your core argument(s) and doesn't let you stray into non-essential text.