I won't be voting for Romney because of religious reasons.
So are those same religious reasons OK with keeping Valerie Jarrett, Sebelius, Holder, Amb Rice, and all those other satanists on Obama's team in power?Sad and scary. The Obama administration is the most evil in the history of our country and you know it. By not voting to get rid of him or wasting your vote on someone you know FULL WELL doesn't stand a chance, you are approving of Obama's evil.
So are those same religious reasons OK with keeping Valerie Jarrett, Sebelius, Holder, Amb Rice, and all those other satanists on Obama's team in power?Sad and scary. The Obama administration is the most evil in the history of our country and you know it. By not voting to get rid of him or wasting your vote on someone you know FULL WELL doesn't stand a chance, you are approving of Obama's evil.
Since there is no thumbs up I will just repeat Ski's post word for word. He is hitting that nail square on the head. By refusing to oppose Obama, you are condoning him or at least guaranteeing 4 more years of his garbage. 4 years the country may not survive.
So are those same religious reasons OK with keeping Valerie Jarrett, Sebelius, Holder, Amb Rice, and all those other satanists on Obama's team in power?Sad and scary. The Obama administration is the most evil in the history of our country and you know it. By not voting to get rid of him or wasting your vote on someone you know FULL WELL doesn't stand a chance, you are approving of Obama's evil.
Since there is no thumbs up I will just repeat Ski's post word for word. He is hitting that nail square on the head. By refusing to oppose Obama, you are condoning him or at least guaranteeing 4 more years of his garbage. 4 years the country may not survive.
Romney is a lock to win Kentucky. My not voting will not change this. I am not condoning any evil by not voting. That is a straw man argument that makes no sense. You are just trying to guilt trip me and it won't work. 🙂
We ain't going to change Donnie's mind and it is a waste of time trying.To get this discussion going again, how about the debate? I have not watched the whole thing yet but initial thoughts are that Romney owned it. I am in the process of wacthing, well listening to it, right now. The full debate posted to YouTube by the NYT is below:[html]<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dkrwUU_YApE?version=3&hl=en_US"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dkrwUU_YApE?version=3&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true">[/html]I think Obama's charge that Romney is a central planner to be hilarious and ludicrous on its face.
There's still far too much work ahead. I remember after McCain picked up Palin in 2008 hearing that the Republicans had the election in the bag. Yes, Romney did exactly framed his vision and pinpointed Obama's problems with the economy is very good fashion, while Obama appeared on the defensive and without much pizzazz. But there are still a few more debates and still many people to win over. Let's hope that Paul Ryan can succeed in the debate with Biden in a similar way.
I expect Ryan to make Biden look like a fool, that is Biden does not do it to himself. If Romney performs as good in the second debate and capitalizes on his performances his start should continue to rise. He needs to continue to hammer away at his vision and point out Obama's failures. Obama has no achievements to tout that the majority of people like and Romney should take advantage of it.I liked the way Romney got Obama to take ownership of Healthcare, that was pretty slick. I also liked the way he pounced every time Obama made one of his idiotic class warfare comments. I just wish he would be as assertive on the campaign. Romney definitely looked presidential while Obama floundered.Romney/Ryan 2012 and 2016