The New Anti-Nationalist School of Historians by Peter Berresford Ellis(I do not have a link, but I'll attach the text file)Good to see this is coming out of London, by an author who was born in England.
My own view is that the school we are dealing withis a neo-colonial one, an anti-nationalist school which in itsmildest form apologises for English imperialism in Ireland, or,in its strongest form supports that imperialism. We could termthose historians from the 26 County state, who are engaged insuch writing, as "Unionist fellow travellers."We are not dealing with a new phenomenon. Until 1921 Irishhistory (we are confining ourselves to the 26 counties) was inthe hands of the Unionist school, just as in the 6 Counties Irishhistory has remained in those hands. Only after the emergence ofthe 26 County state did the nationalist interpretation become thegenerally accepted view of Irish history--which was based on thepremise that the Irish people had a moral right to fight fortheir political, economic, social and cultural independenceagainst the imperial ethics of their big neighbor--was theaccepted view of history. Perhaps we can now call it thetraditional view of Irish history.
Just in case any of you Unionists are reading this, let's look at some facts. The Republic of Ireland has the greatest return emigration rate BY FAR than any country in the UK, and in the 1990's the economy grew four times the rate than that of any other country in Europe. The corporate tax rate of 12.5 % is one of the lowest of all EU member countries. Northern Ireland (that's the area you control, London) is one of the highest in the UK at nearly 28%.Gee, where am I as a foreign investor going to spend my money?
I've only got a little Irish blood. Mostly I just find their history very fascinating…the underdogs who came out victorious. My rugby coach is from Ireland too, so I talk to him a lot about it.Now about that Guinness... ;D