- This topic has 4 voices and 3 replies.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
History, politics, and culture articles and forum discussions.
- By
Home › Forums › Ancient Civilizations › The wandering Roman capital
Question: why did the western half of the empire keep changing locations of it's capital after the 4th century? Better trade routes up north perhaps, but any other reasons in addition?
Well how often did it change? Wasn't it only like three or four times? My guess as to why it changed was because the western empire kept being divided.
Well, isn't three or four times a lot? I guess it seems to me that Rome had the infrastructure and glorious past, yet it decreased in focus during the 4th and 5th centuries. I realize that the Constantine's departure for Constantinople had something to do with this as well.
The Western capital was secondary so the Romans didn't give it the attention it did to Constantinople. The West was still “frontier” in their eyes.
Security reasons–Rome could not be defended–ended up in the far north of Italy in a place called Ravenna which was more easily defended--fens and swamps abounded in the area, but communication by sea was not difficult. In 476, as we all know, Odoacer deposed the last Emperor--at Ravenna.
Marriage customs in Ancient Babylon Ancient Babylonia was a society, which, although it did not …
In 407 B.C. and again in 405 B.C.. the Spartans in alliance with their old enemies, the Persians, …
I came across an article about the lemons and other citrus fruits in the ancient Roman world. …