• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

WCF

History, politics, and culture articles and forum discussions.

You are here: Home / Topics / Why was Switzerland not invaded during WWII?

- By

Why was Switzerland not invaded during WWII?

Home › Forums › Modern Europe › World War II › Why was Switzerland not invaded during WWII?

  • This topic has 5 voices and 9 replies.
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 31, 2010 at 9:25 pm #1911 Reply
    Phidippides
    Keymaster

    A neutral country, yes; but that alone should not have stopped Hitler from invading.  Was there another, better reason why he didn't invade?

    January 31, 2010 at 10:40 pm #18337 Reply
    Wally
    Participant

    Hopefully this will not upset too many folks but Wikipedia (my usual fast and dirty first approximation) indicates that quick mobilization combined with economic considrations were at first saving graces. Later the turn of larger events left them as a low priority for invasion.

    February 1, 2010 at 10:25 am #18338 Reply
    scout1067
    Participant

    Switzerland was not invaded for the purely practical reason that it was at times useful to have neutral ground where representatives of the combatant countries could meet.  I know this sounds odd but it is also true.  The Nazi's, American's, British, Russians, and just about everybody floated around Switzerland during the war spying on and occasionally talking to each other.  It was actually a pretty useful place.Wally, Sorry to say it, but even universal military service would not have kept the Swiss free if the Nazi's had really wanted to conquer it.  It was more useful unoccupied than occupied.  Wikipedia is dead wrong in this instance.

    February 1, 2010 at 3:31 pm #18339 Reply
    Wally
    Participant

    I agree with your proposition… even during WWII there was a more civilized level of statesmanship (on all sides) than today. History provides another idea though; the Swiss had traditionally been allowed their neutrality since the Congress of Vienna. Add in that Geneva was the base for the International Red Cross; no, the Swiss wouldn't have stopped the Germans but would have been a pain in the process.

    February 1, 2010 at 4:41 pm #18340 Reply
    DonaldBaker
    Participant

    Switzerland bankrolled the Nazis didn't it?  Isn't that why so many holocaust families are trying to get their money returned to them?

    February 1, 2010 at 4:58 pm #18341 Reply
    Wally
    Participant

    I don't think bankrolled as much as banked for the Nazis….

    February 2, 2010 at 8:49 am #18342 Reply
    scout1067
    Participant

    The Swiss bank for everybody and have for a long time.  They don't ask questions about where the money came from.  That is the origin of the current dispute between the US and UBS.  I personally dont think the Swiss should back down.  Maybe the US should look at at some of its confiscatory tax policies instead.  I have thought about getting a Swiss bank account to avoid taxes, at least until the current blow-up started, guess I will have to go to the Cayman's now. ;DTheir neutrality was and is a plus for everybody because it allows contacts between belligerents that would otherwise be impossible.  Swiss neutrality was instrumental in peace efforts during WWI as well when the Austrian Emperor tried to find out if the allies were willing to conclude a separate peace with him.

    February 2, 2010 at 3:08 pm #18343 Reply
    Wally
    Participant

    Agree; 100%.

    February 2, 2010 at 4:26 pm #18344 Reply
    Phidippides
    Keymaster

    The Swiss bank for everybody and have for a long time.  They don't ask questions about where the money came from.

    That Swiss banks offer more protection against government intrusion is reflected by the fact that people ranging from the slightly shady to the most hardened of criminals request that others send money to their Swiss bank accounts…at least on TV and movies  ;D .  But really, I think that the whole idea of Swiss privacy in their banks is interesting….does this date to WWII neutrality, or did it predate it?  I find it interesting that Switzerland has been able to avoid much international pressure to open up its banking system, whereas other smaller countries would probably cave to international pressure. 

    February 3, 2010 at 9:02 am #18345 Reply
    scout1067
    Participant

    It dates back a couple hundred years to when the Swiss provided secret banking to members of the French nobility. Historical origins of Swiss bank secrecy  The Swiss arent the only ones to do it, there are several other places around the world that do the same thing, the Swiss are just the best and most well known.

    February 23, 2010 at 7:28 pm #18346 Reply
    willyD
    Participant

    I would opine that in addition to all the other reasons mentioned we also have to consider geography andSwiss preparations for war.  All adult hale males had had military training and their weapons were excellent–mostly German–and the troops were familiar with the territory.  All the passes were ready tobe blown up making armoured thrusts difficult in the extreme.  Switzerland is mountains and with fewexceptions attackers are at a distinct disadvantage–it is all uphill!  Think of the Turks in Montenegro, the Americans in Italy in WWII and the Italians on the Austrian front in WWI. The Germans made many mistakes in WWII.  The invasion of Switzerland was not one of them.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
Reply To: Why was Switzerland not invaded during WWII?
Your information:




Primary Sidebar

Login

Log In
Register Lost Password

Blog Categories

Search blog articles

Before Footer

  • Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?

    Julian the Apostate stands as an enigmatic figure among Roman emperors, ascending to power in 361 AD …

    Read More

    Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?
  • The Babylonian Bride

    Marriage customs in Ancient Babylon Ancient Babylonia was a society, which, although it did not …

    Read More

    The Babylonian Bride
  • The fall of Athens

    In 407 B.C. and again in 405 B.C.. the Spartans in alliance with their old enemies, the Persians, …

    Read More

    The fall of Athens

Footer

Posts by topic

2016 Election Alexander Hamilton American Revolution archaeology Aristotle Ben Franklin Black Americans Charles Dickens Christianity Christmas Constantine Custer's Last Stand Egypt email engineering England forum security Founding Fathers France future history George Washington Germany Greece hacker Hitler Industrial Revolution Ireland James Madison Jewish medieval military history Paleolithic philosophy pilgrimage Rome Russia SEO Slavery Socrates spammer technology Trump World War I World War II Year In Review

Recent Topics

  • Midsummer Night: June 25th
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?
  • Release of the JFK Files
  • What was the greatest military advancement of all time?

RSS Ancient News

Recent Forum Replies

  • Going to feature old posts
  • What’s new?
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Testing out a new feature

Copyright © 2025 · Contact

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.