• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

WCF

History, politics, and culture articles and forum discussions.

You are here: Home / Topics / Hello domain.specialist.john

- By

Hello domain.specialist.john

Home › Forums › Announcements › Hello domain.specialist.john

  • This topic has 2 voices and 4 replies.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 29, 2010 at 7:20 am #1907 Reply
    Phidippides
    Keymaster

    Welcome domain.specialist.john.Are ye a spammer?  Looks like it.  But if you are, you are the first spammer I have seen who posts an actual photo of a guy (yourself?) for your avatar.

    March 27, 2010 at 1:53 pm #18251 Reply
    DonaldBaker
    Participant

    Welcome domain.specialist.john.Are ye a spammer?  Looks like it.  But if you are, you are the first spammer I have seen who posts an actual photo of a guy (yourself?) for your avatar.

    And your experimentation with spammer outreach failed.  Nice try though.  LOL

    March 27, 2010 at 7:47 pm #18252 Reply
    Phidippides
    Keymaster

    Thanks.  I think I deleted his account soon after my post.  The WCF Spammer Outreach program hasn't had the success I was hoping for thus far.  It's far too easy to resort to the sword rather than the handshake when it comes to spammers.  😉

    April 7, 2011 at 3:18 pm #18253 Reply
    Phidippides
    Keymaster

    I have noticed a new spammer strategy that has been implemented over the last few months.  Rather than post spammy links in new threads, they simply register on the forum and stay quiet for a few days.  Then, they return to the forum, add their spammy links to their profile page (either in their signature, or in the location where they can put their homepage address).  It's hard to catch these guys since they use this delay tactic.  I checked many of the new members from the past few months and deleted a bunch of people who never posted messages but put hyperlinks in their profiles.  Argh!

    April 9, 2011 at 1:28 pm #18254 Reply
    DonaldBaker
    Participant

    I still don't see what they get out of doing this?  Nobody clicks their links or even checks their profiles.  And sites like these that have relatively low traffic don't garner them much in that regard either.  Seems stupid to me to waste so much time scouring the web and registering everywhere like they do.  But they sure do believe in it.

    April 9, 2011 at 7:38 pm #18255 Reply
    Phidippides
    Keymaster

    The basic train of thought is that search engines rank sites based on the number of links pointing to them.  Even if no one clicks on links, search engine spiders will find these links.  If an important site (like the NY Times) were to have a link to WCF, our rankings in the search engines would probably jump.  Back when I was more into SEO, I recall something about how after the first two or three pages of search results, the number of clicks decreases quite a bit.  Whatever a site can do to keep its site pretty high on the list of search results is for the better (according to conventional wisdom).  Many years ago (around 1999 or so) I joined a free backlinks service, so each site that joined would upload a page on its web site with backlinks to all the other sites which also joined.  This was before I think this kind of thing was really frowned upon.  The thing now is that Google tweaks its secret ranking algorithm from time to time, and so all these spammy backlinks to sites will not necessarily help a site rise to the top.  Still, spammers will do what they think will work…but in the end they're probably simply annoying us rather than helping themselves.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
Reply To: Hello domain.specialist.john
Your information:




Primary Sidebar

Login

Log In
Register Lost Password

Blog Categories

Search blog articles

Before Footer

  • Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?

    Julian the Apostate stands as an enigmatic figure among Roman emperors, ascending to power in 361 AD …

    Read More

    Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?
  • The Babylonian Bride

    Marriage customs in Ancient Babylon Ancient Babylonia was a society, which, although it did not …

    Read More

    The Babylonian Bride
  • The fall of Athens

    In 407 B.C. and again in 405 B.C.. the Spartans in alliance with their old enemies, the Persians, …

    Read More

    The fall of Athens

Footer

Posts by topic

2016 Election Alexander Hamilton American Revolution archaeology Aristotle Ben Franklin Black Americans Charles Dickens Christianity Christmas Constantine Custer's Last Stand Egypt email engineering England forum security Founding Fathers France future history George Washington Germany Greece hacker Hitler Industrial Revolution Ireland James Madison Jewish medieval military history Paleolithic philosophy pilgrimage Rome Russia SEO Slavery Socrates spammer technology Trump World War I World War II Year In Review

Recent Topics

  • Midsummer Night: June 25th
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?
  • Release of the JFK Files
  • What was the greatest military advancement of all time?

RSS Ancient News

Recent Forum Replies

  • Going to feature old posts
  • What’s new?
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Testing out a new feature

Copyright © 2025 · Contact

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.