Home › Forums › General History Chat › British words now invading American lexicon
- This topic has 4 voices and 15 replies.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 5, 2012 at 3:31 pm #3348
Phidippides
KeymasterWhile American vocabulary has entered that of Britain in the past, now it is going the other way around.'Britishisms' Creeping into American English
October 5, 2012 at 4:36 pm #27646skiguy
ModeratorLoving this!!!I have to go petrol up my lorry now. BTW, it is red in colour.
October 5, 2012 at 5:33 pm #27647Phidippides
KeymasterSorry, but all that sounds so lame.
October 5, 2012 at 7:21 pm #27648donroc
ParticipantI have used “twit” since my college days.
October 5, 2012 at 10:02 pm #27649skiguy
ModeratorSorry, but all that sounds so lame.
It's not lame, it's cool. 8)
October 6, 2012 at 1:18 pm #27650scout1067
ParticipantSpeaking as someone whose mother is English, that is in fact lame. What's next we go as far down the path of cultural destruction as have the English?
October 6, 2012 at 3:31 pm #27651Phidippides
KeymasterI did not realize that “twit” was a word common to the British. It does sound like it's somewhat pretentious, though, so perhaps that is a dead giveaway. 🙂 I think on occasion I have heard someone refer to a "flat" rather than an apartment. I don't think that irks me as much as some other words do.
October 6, 2012 at 3:38 pm #27652scout1067
ParticipantI positively loathe the English accent. Hearing it makes me want to punch somebody. Also, getting called a Yank makes me absolutely see red. At that point I just call 'em a Limey and walk away before the fight starts.I will admit that English historians tend to write stylistically better than do Americans.
October 6, 2012 at 3:43 pm #27653skiguy
ModeratorI positively love the British accent and wish I could pull it off better (I usually end up sounding Australian instead). I too like British historians the best but they tend to use superlative words a little too much.And what does using British words have to do with cultural devestation? If anything, it preserves the culture.
October 7, 2012 at 10:09 am #27654scout1067
ParticipantTake a visit to England and you will see. There are more non-English in London than English people and they have sanitized their culture to the point of destruction to avoid offending the invaders. Just examine the way they handle their Muslim extremists with kid gloves. They are well on the way to submission, even the French are defending their culture more than the English.
October 7, 2012 at 12:55 pm #27655skiguy
ModeratorLike any large city there is a huge diversity. Just go to NYC you'll think you're in Beijing. I always hear this about London (who was that author who wrote Londanistan?) yet I see no evidence of it whatsoever other than oil shieks owning some of the big soccer teams, yet ironically it's predominantly European players who are the bigger stars. Name any foreign player who is more famous or more well liked than Wayne Rooney, Ryan Giggs, or Steven Gerrard. The Olympics certainly didn't hold back on being pure British. Look at the sport culture too. Again, very British in nature. And proudly so. There is no PC affirmative action crap on the Oxford or Cambridge crews. Whenever I read about or talk to British people, I don't see a dying culture, I see a proud nation. There is far more criticism of the Empire from those in the US than those who are British.
Just examine the way they handle their Muslim extremists with kid gloves.
Give me an example of this. I see them acting tougher on terrorism than we do sometimes.
October 7, 2012 at 1:28 pm #27656donroc
ParticipantRegarding the Brit accent, back in 1960 when I moved to Hollywood for no fame and little fortune, the word was — if one spoke with a British accent (usually a female secretary or male clothier), the question would be: “Are you from England or merely affected?”
October 7, 2012 at 1:32 pm #27657donroc
ParticipantOne can approach a cultured British accent without forcing it by doing what most Americans do not:1. Open the mouth wider to pronounce words2. Speak through the diaphragm not through nose or throat.
October 7, 2012 at 2:03 pm #27658skiguy
ModeratorThere are as many different dialects of the British accent as there are American accents in the states. You can even tell the difference between Daniel Craig and Jason Statham. Statham is more blue-collar where Craig sounds more aristocratic. I get a kick out of some of these rugby guys who play like beasts and look dumb as a rock, but then when you hear them talk they sound like they have a PhD.I thnk the Aussie/NZ accent is a cross between a hard core Boston (Bahston) accent and a British one. The Aussies drop their R's like we do up here in New England. It's a shock not a shark.
October 7, 2012 at 2:58 pm #27659Phidippides
KeymasterThere are as many different dialects of the British accent as there are American accents in the states. You can even tell the difference between Daniel Craig and Jason Statham. Statham is more blue-collar where Craig sounds more aristocratic. I get a kick out of some of these rugby guys who play like beasts and look dumb as a rock, but then when you hear them talk they sound like they have a PhD.
I think that's the difference between a cockney (e.g. "Benny Hill") accent of the commoners and the more refined, "royal" accent which sounds far more sweet to the ears.
Regarding the Brit accent, back in 1960 when I moved to Hollywood for no fame and little fortune, the word was -- if one spoke with a British accent (usually a female secretary or male clothier), the question would be: "Are you from England or merely affected?"
I wonder if you are referring to the "Trans-Atlantic" accent which apparently became popular mid-century, and which seems to be the typical way people spoke in movies around that time. It's kind of an "Britisized-American" way of pronouncing words. In the video below, which I remember came out a few years ago, the very last accent the girl does is "Trans-Atlantic".[html][/html]
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.