- This topic has 3 voices and 4 replies.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 16, 2007 at 5:26 am #607
Phidippides
KeymasterDonnie, I suggest that you edit the First Great Awakening entry at Wikipedia:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Great_AwakeningRight now it's not that great at first glance and could use some sprucing up. Go fer it!
March 16, 2007 at 4:13 pm #8384DonaldBaker
ParticipantI'll put this on the backburner for the moment, but it is apparent that much needs to be done on that entry. The bibliography is a good start, but by no means complete. The historical summation is way too generalized and lacking in the consequences of the movement as a trans-colonial event…the first trans-colonial event I might add. Yes, when I have some more time, I will see what I can do to make it better. 😉
March 16, 2007 at 5:47 pm #8385Phidippides
KeymasterWell, remember to seize the day! Otherwise millions of denizens could be wandering through life with blatant misconceptions about the First Great Awakening, leading our world into chaotic madness. 😥 😥Ok, actually I wasn't thinking you need to do anything really in depth at the moment. I was going to start editing at least for clarity, but then it occurred to me that you should add your 2 cents. Incidentally, I've been thinking of revamping my http://www.great-awakening site (probably using a CMS) and adding sections. Of course I would want to include some of your contributions to the site as well...in fact I think using a CMS would enable me to do that better.
March 16, 2007 at 7:56 pm #8386Stumpfoot
ParticipantPhid, I have peeked in to your GA site, do you get much traffic over there?
March 16, 2007 at 11:37 pm #8387DonaldBaker
ParticipantWell, remember to seize the day! Otherwise millions of denizens could be wandering through life with blatant misconceptions about the First Great Awakening, leading our world into chaotic madness. 😥 😥Ok, actually I wasn't thinking you need to do anything really in depth at the moment. I was going to start editing at least for clarity, but then it occurred to me that you should add your 2 cents. Incidentally, I've been thinking of revamping my http://www.great-awakening site (probably using a CMS) and adding sections. Of course I would want to include some of your contributions to the site as well...in fact I think using a CMS would enable me to do that better.
It's going to be difficult to build that site with a cms. Such a topic specific site will require quite a bit of research to gather enough materials to keep the site interesting and growing. But if you are going to go with a cms system, it should be blog oriented IMHO. Checkout Blogcms before you go with Joomla or the others. Blogcms has a punbb forum installed in the package with it and a wiki for terms. That's what I used for my DarkLordofConservatism blog (which I don't have time for anymore). You might find it suitable to what you are attempting, and then again you may not. 😀
March 17, 2007 at 12:59 am #8388Phidippides
KeymasterPhid, I have peeked in to your GA site, do you get much traffic over there?
I don't get a ton of traffic, but it does add up. I don't actively tend to it so it's not like it's much work for me. I believe I've noticed surges in the Fall, likely around the time college American history courses start up.Donnie perhaps you have a different experience with CMS, but I think that something like Mambo would work fine. I'm biased toward it because I've had experience working with it. A blog is something you really have to keep up to be any good, and I'm thinking more of a static resource for the site with the option to easily add articles to it when I want. While I love the idea of a blog I've seen blogs that die out over time, perhaps from fatigue, perhaps from running out of ideas. I say just put the ideas into static pages where people can read information they seek. Besides....to me WCF is almost like a blog, but ever more interactive. 🙂
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.