Home › Forums › Ancient Civilizations › Gladiator 2
- This topic has 5 voices and 11 replies.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 8, 2006 at 9:07 am #444
livewirerules
Participanti really loved the first part of gladiator.It was really awesome movie.So now the second part is to be released in the future..Soon i guess
December 9, 2006 at 2:36 am #7367Stumpfoot
ParticipantI have heard nothing of a Gladiator 2.
December 9, 2006 at 2:35 pm #7368livewirerules
Participanti found this info 3 months ago http://www.film-releases.com/movies/film-information/movie-368
December 9, 2006 at 5:03 pm #7369Phidippides
KeymasterHere's more information:Looks like Russell Crowe isn't going to be in the movie, unless it's just a cameo appearance.
December 9, 2006 at 8:49 pm #7370DonaldBaker
ParticipantI think they're making a big mistake doing this. Gladiator is one of my all time favorite movies, but it was not designed to have a sequel or a prequel whatever. It could diminish the franchise IMHO.
December 9, 2006 at 9:26 pm #7371Stumpfoot
ParticipantLEAVE WELL ENOUGH ALONE! This movie stands on its own as a classic and a sequal will only harm it's reputation (Look at Rocky, a great movie franchised to death).
December 9, 2006 at 11:10 pm #7372Phidippides
KeymasterSince I didn't hold it quite as highly as some of you, a sequel isn't unattractive. Since they'll be revolving the story on someone other than Maximus (I'm guessing) the story could involve something interesting. How often do we get to see Hollywood-sized blockbusters about ancient Rome?
December 9, 2006 at 11:15 pm #7373DonaldBaker
ParticipantSince I didn't hold it quite as highly as some of you, a sequel isn't unattractive. Since they'll be revolving the story on someone other than Maximus (I'm guessing) the story could involve something interesting. How often do we get to see Hollywood-sized blockbusters about ancient Rome?
Yes, but the temptation to follow the formula of the original to ensure a blockbuster type hit insults us true fans. We don't want to recycle another Gladiator performance, we want something original. Yes there are many stories that can be done on Rome...countless no doubt.....but to associate it with a previous movie in an attempt to milk the former movie's success is cheap I think. Quo Vadis, Cleopatra, The Fall of the Roman Empire, Gladiator, Spartacus, and Ben Hur are all great movies about the Roman era, but they all stood on their own without mooching off of a previous movie. I know Ridley Scott can be more original if he wanted to be.
December 10, 2006 at 12:25 am #7374Stumpfoot
ParticipantLets not forget that this link is almost 3 years old. I checked IMDB and there was nothing. So for now it looks as though it's not happening.
September 1, 2012 at 1:42 am #7375Phidippides
KeymasterLooks like the sequel never came to be.
September 1, 2012 at 9:29 am #7376scout1067
ParticipantHere is a kind of an update: Why Gladiator 2 Never HappenedApparently the screenplay was horrible.
September 1, 2012 at 3:53 pm #7377Phidippides
KeymasterInteresting, I did not know that. This is also kind of strange:
I got my hands on his script and read it late into the night. It was unlike anything I had read before. It was absurd, in the very best way. The script featured Maximus being cast out of purgatory by the Gods and sent to destroy the growing cult of Christianity.
Not only was the original Gladiator supposed to be a historical film, rather than a mytho-historical one, but having a plot to destroy burgeoning Christianity doesn't sound like it would go over all that well.
September 2, 2012 at 6:40 am #7378scout1067
ParticipantYou never know, who would have guessed such obvious propaganda as Fahrenheit 9/11 would do so well?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.