- This topic has 11 voices and 22 replies.
-
Posts
-
Well, we're really near the end of year 2007 and near the fears competitions of the presidential elections.i guess whoever wins this elections tells what America is going to be in the next three years. since all of them have many different moral standrads it will either add to the moral decline of America or lift it up slightly.what do u think?
I think none of the candidates that are running are going to capture the “moral majority” of America….whatever and whoever they are. 🙂
I agree with Don. As far as electable candidates, there isn't really one who catches my eye. As long as whoever will be President puts national security as a top priority. Hopefully Madame President won't cut the CIA and military like her husband did.
Me too. I think none of the presidential canidates are good moral leaders :-[
Better the brother than the mother.
The problem that I see is within the definition of “morals”. One would have to define just what their interpretation of it is, before any particular candidate could be assigned as the best fit to that conclusion. It is already obvious to me, that based on comments in this thread, it would be highly likely that several of us would have different interpretations, and therefore personal choices for best candidate.Now if you use the partisan definition of "moral majority", I would think you end up with exactly zero candidates, of the top 3 or 4 from either party. Just ask the RR. They are looking at running an independent.
Morals are the Blibical principals on which our country was founded on.
Or the corruptions of same that the society as a whole will tolerate.
Agreed with the rest none of the canidates really do have moral majority.. and I'm not sure any of them will….
What is your take on what the major issue will be. I sayTerror/Iraq/IranEnergy independenceIllegal immigration in that order...
The fourth issue will be climate change and our carbon footprints…because of the social agenda behind it.
Good choice. That may actually be tied for first with the GWOT, only because the economic consequences from the religion of AGW will harm everyone globally. It already has started.
Gov. Palin was a nice surprise, but I'm not yet sure if she is enough to warrant me voting for the wishy washy McCain.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
