Colbert sought to increase the wealth and power of France through general adherenceto mercantilism, which stressed government regulation of economic activities to benefit the state
This isn't Socialism, right? So what would it be similar to? Communism?
Colbert sought to increase the wealth and power of France through general adherenceto mercantilism, which stressed government regulation of economic activities to benefit the state
This isn't Socialism, right? So what would it be similar to? Communism?
I have of course heard of mercantilism before but wasn't really sure about the nature of that system. I just read parts of the page Donnie linked to. I must say, mercantilism described there sounds quite a bit like your basic free enterprise, capitalist system – at least to a degree. Where it parts most, however, is in the strict control of imports. Having such a favorable trade balance will, in fact, lead to a greater concentration of financial resources; whether or not it creates greater wealth is another story. Here are some comments on what I see. The problem of mercantilism is in the failure to embrace the efficient allocation of resources, which is something fundamental to a capitalist system. Mercantilists would likely argue that something ought to be produced domestically for domestic consumption rather than import such goods, even if importing them would lead to a lower price (i.e. economic efficiency). For example, Spain could restrict imports of apples with tariffs or whatnot so as to force Spanish people to buy apples from Spanish produces. Say that the climate in Spain is not all that conducive to growing apples, making them more scarce and thereby forcing their price to increase. Say also that the climate in England is ideal for growing apples and that they could provide them to the Spanish at a market price (ignoring the tariffs) at half the market price the Spanish are selling them at. If the English apples could be sold in Spain, money would flow out of Spain and into England (unfavorable trade balance for Spain) but Spanish consumers would end up with more wealth, since their money would purchase more goods in the end. But the outflow of cash/bullion is what mercantilist countries want to avoid.
….... mercantilism described there sounds quite a bit like your basic free enterprise, capitalist system - at least to a degree. Where it parts most, however, is in the strict control of imports. Having such a favorable trade balance will, in fact, lead to a greater concentration of financial resources; whether or not it creates greater wealth is another story. ....... the outflow of cash/bullion is what mercantilist countries want to avoid.
This is the gold part of the old God, Gold, and Glory plan of colonization... more about exploitation than capitalization, methinks. One of the reasons the Brits didn't fight any harder to keep US was that we produced little that they couldn't get elsewhere with less muss and fuss. So too, we were beginning to compete with them by producing things locally that they had been supplying to US 😮As for Spain; getting the Jews and Muslims out worked to tear down their economic machine... when the small businessmen and the agricultural experts (w/regard to irrigation of semi-arid areas) were banished all that bullion had to be spent on imports; opps! :-