- This topic has 6 voices and 49 replies.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 9, 2006 at 9:22 pm #5848
illumintai
Participantarent there plentry of plugins for making it difficult for spammers ?
September 10, 2006 at 4:16 am #5849Phidippides
KeymasterThe CAPTCHA plugin is the most foolproof so far. The self-registration didn't work all that well because they would still sign up even if they don't post. I'd prefer a completely spam-free forum, if that's possible. 🙂
September 15, 2006 at 7:11 pm #5850Stumpfoot
ParticipantSpam free? I think I made some comment like that when I was a kid, so we switched to potted meat……that was a joke.
November 2, 2006 at 11:04 pm #5851Stumpfoot
ParticipantA new high of 49 users yesterday! Now if we can only get that many members on in a day.
November 2, 2006 at 11:10 pm #5852Phidippides
KeymasterA new high of 49 users yesterday! Now if we can only get that many members on in a day.
Yes and most of them were spiders. 🙁 I happened to be on when they arrived....Yahoo had about 47 different spiders on at once. Unfortunately we can't train them to post but perhaps they can help index the forum a little bit better. 🙂
November 2, 2006 at 11:16 pm #5853Stumpfoot
ParticipantHow does that work when someone does a search? The more the site gets hit and cataloged does it move up the food chain at all?
November 3, 2006 at 8:03 pm #5854DonaldBaker
ParticipantI had 87 spiders hit Gunsandall.com the other night and I about freaked! At first I thought they were actual visitors but then I realized that they were logging in and out in a timed pattern so I figured out they were not human. Since then the links on Yahoo have skyrocketed.
November 3, 2006 at 8:54 pm #5855Stumpfoot
ParticipantI had 87 spiders hit Gunsandall.com the other night and I about freaked! At first I thought they were actual visitors but then I realized that they were logging in and out in a timed pattern so I figured out they were not human. Since then the links on Yahoo have skyrocketed.
Then I assume thats a good thing?
November 4, 2006 at 6:38 am #5856DonaldBaker
ParticipantWell yeah, but spiders don't buy and sell guns do they?(lol)
November 6, 2006 at 5:49 am #5857Stumpfoot
ParticipantWell I was thinking that the more links one has to their site the better that would be.
November 23, 2006 at 7:54 am #5858rhino56
ParticipantThis is a topic i seem to be well versed in despite my lack of even wanting to know this stuff.SEO (search engine optimization) im sure in your search for finding ways to get more traffic you have run into this or maybe even have a great amount of knowledge in it. Either way i would say dont waste your time and energy in trying to learn about it. Its basically a cheat when it comes down to it. Google and other search engines do a fine job of searching out sites, when you do massive seo it tries to up the page rank and it can do that quite well also. The problem with it is as soon as the search engines get modified to compensate for such seo practices the sites that were way up top fall way down low. In some cases maybe even blacklisted so the google bot wont be back again. 🙁There is no replacement for content, eventually this site will be ranked in search engines as it should be. with the amount of relevant content it has. So stay focused on what you seem to be best at and dont worry about the rest. It will all be history shortly.lolHaving outside links to your website will help the most. Try doing link exchanges with other relevant sites. all they can say is no, but all it does it help both sites. but dont let it take time away from actually adding content to the site.be thankful for the bots, even though they are spammers they are another member signed up, while this doesnt do anything other than say we have XXX members and so many topics and this many people online. that plays a big factor on if people will join or not.So if they spam delete it and ban them but they also may be the cause of someone deciding to join or not to join. Nobody goes to a cemetary to find friends or advice.So although it would be great to have a perfect forum with no spam members and ever person active, but that probably wont happen. Even members who have many great posts might become stagnant or just burnt out on it for long periods of time. this is really quite normal.Word of mouth, bumper stickers, signs in areas like schools that are eye catching, and most of all, what do you have here that historyforums doesnt? the content is everything, and having unique content is what will do the best for you. (even though most sites will steal it right away)The most important thing that will be tested by this website is you, your longevity and your ability to persevere when it isnt becoming all you hoped for, and all you thought it might, when it lets you down and all hope for it seems lost, hopefully a revelation will come for it, maybe it will be you.
November 23, 2006 at 8:48 am #5859DonaldBaker
ParticipantFor my sites, I am in it on a five year plan (how Leninesque of me)….but anyway, I know it is going to take a long time to gain the necessary momentum to maintain sustained growth. But I have nothing but time. 🙂
November 24, 2006 at 12:23 am #5860Stumpfoot
ParticipantGood post Rhino56. I think this is a great site that will have it's day if we just give it a chance.
January 27, 2007 at 5:10 pm #5861Phidippides
KeymasterI recently had someone renege on a post exchange deal. I posted 15 on the guy's forum and he didn't post anything on mine. It was the first time I've had someone bail out on me like that, so it doesn't feel too good. The other guy got something for nothing and I got the short end of the stick.
January 27, 2007 at 5:31 pm #5862DonaldBaker
ParticipantIf someone joins my site, I'll reciprocate. If not, then I really don't have the time to mess around with them anyway. Of course it would probably help if the person you are exchanging posts with held similar interests. If their site is about Celtic Mythology and your site is Western Civilization, they might not be enthused to join. Now if this were a porno forum……..:)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.