- This topic has 5 voices and 19 replies.
-
Posts
-
In my reasearch and readings I came across this:
It is a delusion to suppose that examiners have no sadistic tendencies, but it would be a remarkably uninhibited sadist who set the question 'What caused the First World War?'1
1 Journal entry found on Questia by Robert Pearce, "The Origins of the First World War".I'm doing a paper on this, and one of the questions asked by the professor is "What are the major long range causes of the war?"So is the professor a sadist? (he's a tough grader!) Or does he exempt himself when he says "major" causes? 😀
To middle school this takes me back.
Just know that those two little provinces started a chain of events that led to World War I and II.
You certainly know more about it than I do, but would it be correct to say those provinces started A chain of events (along with all the other chains) that started the two world wars?
Just know that those two little provinces started a chain of events that led to World War I and II.
You certainly know more about it than I do, but would it be correct to say those provinces started A chain of events (along with all the other chains) that started the two world wars?
Yes you could say that. Not all events form flashpoints of drastic change though.
