James Garfield [Public domain], by Ole Peter Hansen Balling (1823–1906) This article has some interesting information on the death of President Garfield who was shot by an assassin's bullet in 1881. He didn't actually die from the bullet, but instead from the unclean hands of others who tried to probe his body for the bullet (they didn't know about germs back then):
The shot in the back was not fatal, not hitting any vital organs. The bullet lodged behind the pancreas."If they had just left him alone he almost certainly would have survived," Millard said.Within minutes, doctors converged on the fallen president, using their fingers to poke and prod his open wounds."Twelve different doctors inserted unsterilized fingers and instruments in Garfield's back probing for this bullet," Millard recounted, "and the first examination took place on the train station floor. I mean, you can't imagine a more germ-infested environment."American doctors at the time didn't believe germs existed at all. And according to Dr. Jeffrey Reznick of the National Library of Medicine, they rejected the use of antiseptics pioneered by British surgeon Joseph Lister, for whom Listerine would later be named...
How doctors killed President GarfieldAccording to the article, Garfield was only in office four years before his death. He was insanely intelligent. I found this amazing:
His father died before he was two years old, so to put himself through college his first year, he was a janitor and a carpenter. By his second year they made him assistant professor of literature and ancient languages."By the time he was 26 he was his college's president. He had just an off-the-charts mind."
Garfield was exceptional. What a difference he might have made. So much for the lefty theory that individuals do not matter regarding the course of History. Assassinations, election outcomes, military stupidity, and untimely deaths do alter the course of History.A few examples:If TR and not WW had won the election of 1912 would the Kaiser have dared sink our ships? Could TR have in 1914 mediated a peace?If Prince Arthur had lived and become King of England instead of Henry VIII.If Carloman had lived instead of Louis the Pious becoming sole heir to Charlemagne's empire.All speculation of course.
Garfield was exceptional. What a difference he might have made. So much for the lefty theory that individuals do not matter regarding the course of History. Assassinations, election outcomes, military stupidity, and untimely deaths do alter the course of History.
I don't deny that he is perhaps a fascinating figure. I just pointed out why I have never studied him in any detail. Blame my Sophomore high school history teacher, who could make the nuking of Japan sound boring. 😀
I am actually kind of interested in the Gilded Age, though I haven't been able to study it all that much. There is good documentary about Mark Twain (I believe by Ken Burns) that I saw a couple years ago.