• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

WCF

History, politics, and culture articles and forum discussions.

You are here: Home / Topics / Where would you have settled in the New World?

- By

Where would you have settled in the New World?

Home › Forums › Early America › Where would you have settled in the New World?

  • This topic has 5 voices and 8 replies.
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 4, 2006 at 9:00 pm #434 Reply
    Phidippides
    Keymaster

    Tell me which geographical area you would have headed for if you were arriving from England during the mid-17th Century.  Base your decision on whatever you want – religious, industrial/agriculture, political, or other reasons.

    December 4, 2006 at 10:00 pm #7308 Reply
    DonaldBaker
    Participant

    I would have preferred the Lower Colonies because of the warmer climate and the relative wealth they enjoyed compared to the Norther Colonies in the early going.  Of course the wealth shifted away from the South within a couple of generations.

    December 4, 2006 at 10:30 pm #7309 Reply
    Stumpfoot
    Participant

    I agree with Donnie. But mostly because of the climate. 😀

    December 4, 2006 at 10:49 pm #7310 Reply
    Phidippides
    Keymaster

    I would have preferred the New England colonies.  Better climate overall, despite some colder weather.  Back in the day it would have been weather that was more conducive to living in as it would have been familiar to the English, and given Puritan-era dress codes it would have been more bearable.  On the downside, agriculture would have been more difficult to be successful at and profitable crops from a European trade standpoint would likely have come more from the South. 

    December 7, 2006 at 6:28 am #7311 Reply
    Stumpfoot
    Participant

    I think specifically I would have picked Virginia. Climate not as severe as New England and longer growing season.

    December 7, 2006 at 7:30 am #7312 Reply
    DonaldBaker
    Participant

    Virginia was actually the most unhealthy of all the colonies initially.  The marshes around the Chesapeake were infested with malaria.  Also, the Powhaten natives were quite antagonistic to the early settlers….and were very powerful compared to their neighbors.  But Virginia, once cleared, became a thriving cash crop economy second only to South Carolina.

    December 7, 2006 at 5:32 pm #7313 Reply
    Phidippides
    Keymaster

    Then how did they deal with the malaria?  Was it simply a matter of draining the swamps to reduce mosquito proliferation?

    December 7, 2006 at 8:22 pm #7314 Reply
    Stumpfoot
    Participant

    Yea, I would have waited until the swamps were drained. 😀

    April 6, 2008 at 6:09 pm #7315 Reply
    BensGal
    Participant

    This is such an interesting question, imo, considering all the factors involved. Through genealogy work, I've proved that ancestors of my father came over not too long after the Mayflower and settled in Virginia then moved onto North Carolina. I've found the same to be true of my mother's maternal relatives. So, using those facts as a basis for this answer it's obvious where I would have lived. Now, if you factor in that I've converted to the Catholic faith, going back in time I would have settled most likely in the Baltimore area, I believe.

    April 6, 2008 at 7:07 pm #7316 Reply
    Wally
    Participant

    As the only background I have that comes from the UK is Irish I'd have likely gone it the back-country… if they were coming that early. However, family history tends to indicat they came later (during or post famine) then likely New York (?) and moved west. Great GF was in the Ill. Vol. in the Civil war according to family legend.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
Reply To: Where would you have settled in the New World?
Your information:




Primary Sidebar

Login

Log In
Register Lost Password

Blog Categories

Search blog articles

Before Footer

  • Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?

    Julian the Apostate stands as an enigmatic figure among Roman emperors, ascending to power in 361 AD …

    Read More

    Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?
  • The Babylonian Bride

    Marriage customs in Ancient Babylon Ancient Babylonia was a society, which, although it did not …

    Read More

    The Babylonian Bride
  • The fall of Athens

    In 407 B.C. and again in 405 B.C.. the Spartans in alliance with their old enemies, the Persians, …

    Read More

    The fall of Athens

Footer

Posts by topic

2016 Election Alexander Hamilton American Revolution archaeology Aristotle Ben Franklin Black Americans Charles Dickens Christianity Christmas Constantine Custer's Last Stand Egypt email engineering England forum security Founding Fathers France future history George Washington Germany Greece hacker Hitler Industrial Revolution Ireland James Madison Jewish medieval military history Paleolithic philosophy pilgrimage Rome Russia SEO Slavery Socrates spammer technology Trump World War I World War II Year In Review

Recent Topics

  • Midsummer Night: June 25th
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?
  • Release of the JFK Files
  • What was the greatest military advancement of all time?

RSS Ancient News

Recent Forum Replies

  • Going to feature old posts
  • What’s new?
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Testing out a new feature

Copyright © 2025 · Contact

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.