• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

WCF

History, politics, and culture articles and forum discussions.

You are here: Home / Topics / Why are liberals so condescending?

- By

Why are liberals so condescending?

Home › Forums › Off Topic › Why are liberals so condescending?

  • This topic has 6 voices and 38 replies.
Viewing 10 posts - 31 through 40 (of 40 total)
← 1 2 3
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 22, 2010 at 3:20 am #18765 Reply
    Phidippides
    Keymaster

    Scott Brown will be the GOP nominee, but Paul might be his VP.  Just a thought.

    I don't think that an abortion-friendly politician would be the presidential candidate for the Republicans. 

    February 22, 2010 at 10:11 am #18766 Reply
    scout1067
    Participant

    Obama is going to get a second term as long as the economy holds together and he follows through on his promise to pull the troops out of Iraq.  But if the dollar collapses and he gets us embroiled in a conflict with Iran, he's out.

    Given the current political climate, no way he gets a second term.  As to the economy, it looks to be sinking into stagflation and not getting any better anytime soon.  All of his proposals entail growing the debt, which means we will have to pay it back sometime.  Conservatives need to keep harping on the economy and they will win and win big.I do not think any of the current suspects will be the nominee in 2012.  I foresee someone coming out of the shadows, like that woman in Minnesota, Michelle Bachman I think.  Palin is too divisive to be broadly popular and much as I hate to say it Romney is a Mormon and that hangs around his neck even though it should not.As to Ron Paul, he is flaky.  On some things he is dead on, on others he is way out in left fied.  He is like pat Buchanan in that respect.  Occasionally Buchanan nails it but the rest of the time he just puts out lunatic ravings.Here is a good quote from a post on IMAO I saw today that nails the problems with Ron Paul in a humorous manner.

    Obligatory Ron Paul Won The CPAC Poll PostPosted by Basil at 4:46 pmNews outlets are playing up the CPAC straw poll that Ron Paul won.Some are asking ?What does this mean?? Others are saying ?Here?s what this means.?Being a conservative blogger ? I?m a better at being a conservative than I am at being a blogger ? it?s my duty to either ask what it means, or say what it means.So, I?ll do neither.Instead, I?ll tell you why Ron Paul is a nutcase: Because he?s nuts.Oh, sure, he has some good ideas. There are many, many issues where he and I agree. And, where we disagree, it?s likely an issue where I?m more conservative than he.But, there are areas where I agree with Barack Obama. Like sending more troops to Afghanistan. If the military says they need more troops, they should get more troops.And, if we want to play to ?I agree with ?? game, it could done with just about anybody.And, on lots of issues, Ron Paul is right.But, he?s like that crazy uncle that fought in the big war. He was right about so many things, and has done a lot of good. But also walks down to the post office and pees on the plastic plants in the corner.That?s Ron Paul. Here?s an old CNN video where he says he doesn?t accept the 9/11 commission findings, and says that our presence in the region contributed to the attacks.

    The 2012 election wil be interesting but any debate about who will run now is academic at best.  The big question is what will happen this fall.  I would love to see the Republicans make gains such that neither party has control of both houses.  What we really need is for government to shut down for a good while and let people see the mess this country is really in.  We need realists in office and not hacks who only try to bring home the bacon while spreading the pain wide enough that they can deflect the blame from themselves.

    February 22, 2010 at 9:48 pm #18767 Reply
    DonaldBaker
    Participant

    I don't accept the 911 Commission findings either.

    February 23, 2010 at 1:21 am #18768 Reply
    Phidippides
    Keymaster

    I had heard that only about 25% of the CPAC attendees voted in the straw poll, and that some (many?) were college students.  So that could have been the reason for the skew.

    February 23, 2010 at 6:03 am #18769 Reply
    scout1067
    Participant

    I don't accept the 911 Commission findings either.

      To change the subject a little, why not?  Even better, what then is the alternative?  I have read the commission report and they were nothing if not rigorous and analytical.  Every other version of what happened smacks of conspiracy theorists.  Just look at the biggest alternative, Loose Change, If that is not flaky, what is?This strand should probably be an entirely different thread.This fall will be interesting.  I saw O's new health proposal that he is going to try an buttonhook the Republicans with.  I think the Republicans should be proud of the “Party of No” moniker as long as they are saying no to idiocy.

    February 23, 2010 at 9:51 pm #18770 Reply
    DonaldBaker
    Participant

    I have learned to question everything from my government these days, especially after 911.  I'm not going to get into this touchy subject here, but let's just say I don't believe we have been told the whole story, and probably never will.

    May 6, 2010 at 1:44 pm #18771 Reply
    scout1067
    Participant

    Saw this quote in the comments section of a satire piece about Ron Paul today and immediately thought of this thread.

    Ron Paul?s unilaterally disarming, blame-America-first views on national security and foreign affairs would spell the end of America as a world power, which is why anti-American leftists like ?Oscar Le Grouche? are rooting for him for all they?re worth. And also which is why the Republican Party must reject him like an invading virus.

    Ironically this poster's summation is exactly why I dislike Ron Paul.  I agree with him on many issues but national security is a show-stopper for me.  We live in a dangerous world and unilateral disarmament will not make it safer.

    May 6, 2010 at 9:05 pm #18772 Reply
    DonaldBaker
    Participant

    Saw this quote in the comments section of a satire piece about Ron Paul today and immediately thought of this thread.

    Ron Paul?s unilaterally disarming, blame-America-first views on national security and foreign affairs would spell the end of America as a world power, which is why anti-American leftists like ?Oscar Le Grouche? are rooting for him for all they?re worth. And also which is why the Republican Party must reject him like an invading virus.

    Ironically this poster's summation is exactly why I dislike Ron Paul.  I agree with him on many issues but national security is a show-stopper for me.  We live in a dangerous world and unilateral disarmament will not make it safer.

    Who is more dangerous than the United States?  We are so far beyond any other nation militarily it isn't even funny.  Russia and China fear us enough that they have joined forces as a counterbalance to our global power.  Just because we are theoretically a benign country, doesn't mean we always will be…and we do spread our weight around the world like it was nobody's business right now.  How long can we afford to be the world's policeman?  Ron Paul's concerns are the costs of empire, and that can be a national security issue too.

    May 8, 2010 at 8:58 pm #18773 Reply
    scout1067
    Participant

    There is a difference between safeguarding national interests and the total disarmament that Paul advocates.  We have not been able to crawl into a cocoon behind two oceans since about the 1880's why he thinks we can do it now I have no idea.  I agree that we need to cut back on the overseas commitment bit.  The question is, if we withdraw from the world, what then happens or are you cool with an ascendant, China, Iran, Russia, and every other two-bit dictator bullying everybody and eventually us?  The difference between lunacy and realism is not very far, unfortunately Ron Paul tilted a little bit too far towards lunacy in his stance on national security for me.  Obama is doing the same with his headlong rush to get rid of our nukes, which Paul also advocates BTW.

    November 23, 2011 at 3:17 pm #18774 Reply
    Omer
    Participant

    I don't know if you appreciate that kind of humor but there is a buzz about a recent event involving a university police officer from Davis University, becoming quite funnyhttp://boingboing.net/2011/11/20/occupy-lulz.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmJmmnMkuEM&feature=player_embedded http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iU7y81FBxu4&feature=player_embedded#!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 10 posts - 31 through 40 (of 40 total)
← 1 2 3
Reply To: Why are liberals so condescending?
Your information:




Primary Sidebar

Login

Log In
Register Lost Password

Blog Categories

Search blog articles

Before Footer

  • Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?

    Julian the Apostate stands as an enigmatic figure among Roman emperors, ascending to power in 361 AD …

    Read More

    Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?
  • The Babylonian Bride

    Marriage customs in Ancient Babylon Ancient Babylonia was a society, which, although it did not …

    Read More

    The Babylonian Bride
  • The fall of Athens

    In 407 B.C. and again in 405 B.C.. the Spartans in alliance with their old enemies, the Persians, …

    Read More

    The fall of Athens

Footer

Posts by topic

2016 Election Alexander Hamilton American Revolution archaeology Aristotle Ben Franklin Black Americans Charles Dickens Christianity Christmas Constantine Custer's Last Stand Egypt email engineering England forum security Founding Fathers France future history George Washington Germany Greece hacker Hitler Industrial Revolution Ireland James Madison Jewish medieval military history Paleolithic philosophy pilgrimage Rome Russia SEO Slavery Socrates spammer technology Trump World War I World War II Year In Review

Recent Topics

  • Midsummer Night: June 25th
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?
  • Release of the JFK Files
  • What was the greatest military advancement of all time?

RSS Ancient News

Recent Forum Replies

  • Going to feature old posts
  • What’s new?
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Testing out a new feature

Copyright © 2025 · Contact

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.