Home › Forums › Modern Europe › World War II › WW2 Fighter Planes
- This topic has 11 voices and 24 replies.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 2, 2007 at 10:43 pm #552
H.H. Buggfuzz
ParticipantWhat do you conider to be the best fighter plane of WW2 either Axis or Allied ?
February 3, 2007 at 4:46 pm #8085John E Reb
ParticipantIn my humble opinion, I would have to say the best allied plane would have to be the P-47 thunderbolt. The P-47 had excellent range, altitude,and armmament ( to the tune of 8 .50 caliber browning machine guns ) it was an excellent weapons platform. The P-47 could be outfitted for either ground attack roles or as a fighter for bomber support, or fighter sorties it was lethal in either role.
February 26, 2007 at 8:04 am #8086Stumpfoot
ParticipantI dont know much about this subject, but how would the Mustang compare?
February 27, 2007 at 4:49 am #8087Phidippides
KeymasterI believe the Germans were working on a jet-propelled fighter that was just going into production at the end of the war….I believe I saw something on in on the History Channel a while back. It might have changed the course of some battled had it been introduced a year or two prior to that. Anyone know more about this?
February 28, 2007 at 2:42 am #8088Wally
Participant... would have to be the P-47 thunderbolt....
+1
March 1, 2007 at 1:53 am #8089DonaldBaker
ParticipantI believe the Germans were working on a jet-propelled fighter that was just going into production at the end of the war....I believe I saw something on in on the History Channel a while back. It might have changed the course of some battled had it been introduced a year or two prior to that. Anyone know more about this?
Messerschmidt developed the first production line jet adopted by the Luftwaffe toward the end of the war. It is believed that the Nazis had jet technology as early as 1939 but Hitler did not believe in the reliability of the jet engine and so he didn't order any jet fighters opting instead for proven radial engine designs. Hitler was probably not wrong in this decision because in the beginning his Stukas were vastly superior to British, French, and Russian planes. The jet was not needed in the initial Blitzkrieg and there was no way to produce enough jets to completely eliminate the radials. It was simply too early for the jet to become dominant, but Hitler could have produced more earlier to augment his existing inventory. Still by war's end, Germany had more planes than pilots so it really didn't matter what propelled them since there was no one available to fly them. 😀
July 12, 2011 at 1:47 pm #8090Omer
ParticipantI believe the Germans were working on a jet-propelled fighter that was just going into production at the end of the war....I believe I saw something on in on the History Channel a while back. It might have changed the course of some battled had it been introduced a year or two prior to that. Anyone know more about this?
It's the Messerschmitt Me 262 : Me 262 had to potential to change the course of the air war in Europe but Hitler ordered that it be used in a capacity that undermined its whole value as a fighter plane.http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/messerschmitt_262.htm http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3VzThjMOdE&NR=1
July 12, 2011 at 4:45 pm #8091donroc
ParticipantAt first sight I fell in love with the Spitfire. I later liked the Mustang and the Yak-5 (or 3) designs.
July 12, 2011 at 5:18 pm #8092Omer
ParticipantAt first sight I fell in love with the Spitfire. I later liked the Mustang and the Yak-5 (or 3) designs.
Just ... listen ! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALe8zKWf3uA&feature=channel_video_title
July 13, 2011 at 1:14 am #8093donroc
ParticipantThank you, Omer. It's like looking at photos of my first love (the girl).
July 13, 2011 at 7:58 am #8094scout1067
ParticipantLast week two warbirds, A FW-190 and P-47 flew over my house here in Germany. I think they were going to an a local airshow at a small WWII airfield not far from where I live. Unfortunately, I did not have time to go to the show. The P-47 was trailing the FW-190 and they were flying fairly low, I would guess about 500-750 feet AGL. It was amazing how loud the planes in WW2 were. I am pretty sure the FW-190 was not original although the P-47 may have been. I don't think there are more ten operational FW-190s in the world and every one I can think of is in a museum.If anyone ever gets to Germany and wants to see German warbirds the Deutches Museum in Munich and their Aviation Annex in Schleißheim has the largest collection of original German warbirds in the world. They also have the only remaining operational ME-262 on display.They also have a U-Boat on display from WWI.
November 10, 2011 at 4:53 am #8095Aetheling
ParticipantAn excavation at the site of a 1941 Spitfire crash in a bog in the Irish Republic uncovered huge, remarkably preserved chunks of plane and six Browning machine guns. After 70 years buried in peat could they be made to fire?http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15652440
November 10, 2011 at 5:04 am #8096Phidippides
KeymasterVery neat – I knew that peat preserved human flesh, but not Browning machine guns.
November 10, 2011 at 11:02 am #8097scout1067
ParticipantThey can probably get the browning to fire. They are one of the most robust machine gun designs ever, right up there with the MG42. When I was in a HMMWV scout platoon in the early '90s we had some Browning .50cals that were over 40 years old and fired perfectly as long as the gunner made sure to double-check the headspace and timing before firing.
November 10, 2011 at 2:20 pm #8098donroc
ParticipantGoogle Jan Safarik and visit his site. He has the most comprehensive list I have seen of fighter aces from all wars and illustrations of their planes. Some of the sources he lists are also useful links.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.