The Santa Muerte cult could probably best be described as a set of ritual practices offered on behalf a supernatural personification of death. The personification is female, probably because the Spanish word for death, muerte, is feminine and possibly also because this personification is a sort of counterpart to the Virgin of Guadalupe.To believers, the entity exists within the context of Catholic theology and is comparable to other purely supernatural beings, namely archangels. The cult involves prayers, rituals, and offerings, which are given directly to Santa Muerte in expectation of and tailored to the fulfillment of specific requests. These bear some resemblance to other traditions.The origin of the cult is uncertain; it has only been expanding recently. The cult appears to be closely associated with crime, criminals, and those whose lives are directly affected by crime. Criminals seem to identify with Santa Muerte and call upon the saint for protection and power, even when committing crimes. They will adorn themselves with her paraphernalia and render her respect that they do not give to other spiritual entities.Many if not most practitioners seem to consider themselves to be, more or less, good, practicing Catholics. Unlike a conventional saint, Santa Muerte definitely appears to be the object of worship rather than a simple intercessor, which is a significant divergence from Catholic doctrine, although the actual practice is not unheard of in the mysteries associated with other Catholic saint traditions, at least unofficially. The name itself is easily confused in translation. Some have translated Santa Muerte into English as “Saint Death”. Although this conveys the concept accurately, the correct literal translation is “Sacred Death” or “Holy Death”.Some of the nicknames are simply variations, including Santísima Muerte [Most Holy Death or Very Holy Death], Sagrada Muerte [Sacred Death], Querida Muerte [Beloved Death], or, in Argentina, San la Muerte [Saint Death – a Masculine variation] Other labels suggest mystical interpretations of her nature, role, and/or relationship to the devotee, such as Poderosa Señora [Powerful Lady], La Comadre [The Co-Mother – possibly a pun on “Co-Redeemer”], La Madrina [The Godmother – notably used in Mexican prisons], or La Hermana [The Sister].Color itself seems to be very important in the Santa Muerte cult. Statues dressed in particular colors represent certain powers or attributes. Similarly, when a devotee lights a candle, or a combination of candles, to Santa Muerte, the color of the candle used corresponds to the desired result. Gold represents economic power, success, and money. Devotees maintain that this color is suited for businessmen and merchants. The natural bone color is believed to promote peace and harmony, particularly among neighbors, and is intended for homes and businesses. The color red is associated with love and passion, as well as emotional stability; it is recommended for couples. White represents purification and defense against negative energy, particularly in situations when there is envy among relatives. Blue is used to help improve mental concentration. Green is the color used to help people with legal problems or matters of justice; it is the color used most often by lawyers. Yellow is the color used for healing from diseases. It is frequently used by drug addicts and alcoholics who are undergoing rehabilitation. The color purple also is purported to bring health. Black represents complete protection, particularly against black magic and hostile spirits associated with Santeria, Palo Mayombe, or voodoo. Black also is the color used by sorcerers to cause harm to their enemies.Other aspects of Santa Muerte iconography have significance as well. Devotees of the saint interpret the sickle, often carried in the right hand, to represent justice, while the globe, often in the left hand, represents dominion over the world. Sometimes, an image of Santa Muerte is holding an ear of corn, which apparently represents generosity. Such symbols are very useful for identifying cult iconography. Whereas the image of the Grim Reaper is a relatively common image and in and of itself does not signify any cult association, when the Death figure is displayed with the ear of corn, a crown, or possibly a globe or scale, it does indicate a Santa Muerte association. The icon itself can come in many forms. Devotees wear small amulets and medals, commonly called milagros in Mexico. They also keep statues and statuettes for offerings. These practices seem to be more or less reminiscent of Catholic saint worship. However, unlike the case with mainstream Catholic practices, devotees of Santa Muerte, particularly incarcerated cult practitioners, will sometimes take the additional step of having the icon tattooed onto their bodies.[ This has been referred to as an offering of skin. In some cases, this is an image of Santa Muerte; in others, it seems to be the entire amulet that is tattooed.[ Such an application is not merely innovative; it is telling. While tattooing has become a mainstream practice in much of North America even among the middle class, in Latin America, tattoos remain the hallmarks of criminal affiliation and imprisonment.The beliefs associated with the cult appear to be relatively consistent. Santa Muerte devotees attend to their practice by lighting candles and leaving offerings while reciting prayers, often ritual prayers, in hopes of receiving favors. Such offerings draw upon Christian symbolism. Tequila, for example is a representation of the chalice of Christ. An apple represents original sin. There appears to be a tradition about what sorts of offerings are appropriate. Santa Muerte has been described as jealous about what offerings are given to her. However, gifts that are somehow personal or in keeping with other religious offerings are considered acceptable. Offerings are not given willy-nilly; there is a recipe and ritual associated with each offering, so as to ensure the granting of the desired effect.Appropriate offerings can include money, flowers, candy, alcohol, tobacco, fruits, water, bread, or incense. Money is a preferred offering, particularly in businesses, when the profits from the first sale of the day are given. Flowers of various types are acceptable, but should be fresh. White roses are normally used for healing or health and are considered to be the preferred form. Red roses are used for love. Candy offerings are also a matter of personal preference, although chocolate is common, particularly for love, and honey is considered to be a standard offering. Wines and liquors are common offerings, especially tequila, rum, and sherry, as well as dark beer; these are usually served in glass bottles or cups but not plastic. Cigars and cigarettes are among the most preferred offerings; they should be lit. Smoke blown over the image is used to purify the altar. Fresh fruit is also used as an offering. Red apples are the commonest offering but other fruits are often left. The color of the fruit can correspond to the benefit sought, in a way comparable to candles. Water is considered to be a crucial offering and should be clear and still, preferably from a tap. Bread is also offered frequently, as is incense. In the case of incense, different types of incense are used for different ends, in varieties that are sold by vendors of esoteric commodities.Just as the offerings are presented in a formulaic manner, the prayers themselves are often highly structured, in a format that resembles Christian collects. Some prayers even refer to the Trinity: “In the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, made of pure light, I implore you to grant me the favors I should request of you until the final day, hour, and moment at which your divine majesty orders me to come before your presence. Desired Death of my heart, do not abandon me from your protection.”Similarities also manifest in the attempt at comprehensiveness that occurs in prayers. This occurs in protection prayers: “Oh, Most Santa Muerte, I call upon you so that, through your image, you may free me from all dangers, whether [these dangers] are physical or from witchcraft, and that through this sacred flame you might purify my body from all charms and curses and that you also bring love, peace, and abundance. So be it.” It also occurs in prayers for success and wealth: “Desired Death of my heart, do not abandon me from [your] protection and I ask your blessing on this devotee of yours and that also you bring success, bring personal and economic prosperity, and take from me all natural or caused disease. So be it.” Of further interest, the ending “so be it” is a translation of the traditional Christian prayer ending, “Amen”.The formula is also applied to curses: “Death of my heart, do not abandon me from your protection and do not permit (name of enemy) a single moment of peace. Molest him each moment, mortify him and worry him so that he always thinks about me and does what I want.”Some phrases to understand:El poder de las tres muertes = The power of the three deathsLa mano de la muerte: para que se cumplan nuestros más caros anhelos = The hand of death: to fulfill the most dear yearningsRitual para alejar a las malas amistades de nuestra pareja = Ritual to send away bad friendships from our partnerRitual contra la magia negra = Ritual against black magicRitual para alejar un amante = Ritual to send away a loverRitual para alejar a los novios = Ritual to send away fiancésPara que tu pareja te ayude económicamente = So that your partner helps you economicallyPara que no entren chismes o nertía negative en tu casa o negocio = So that gossip or negative energy does not enter your home or businessVelación a la Santa Muerte para que nos paguen una deuda = Prayer to Santa Muerte so that a debt is paid to usRitual para socorrer a quienes estan presos = Ritual to comfort those in prisonLa balanza de la justicia: ritual para resolver problemas legales = The balance of justice: ritual to resolve legal problemsRitual para quienes serán sometidos a una intervención quirúrgica = Ritual for those who will undergo surgeryBálsamo de la Santa Muerte para que marche bien tu negocio = Balsam of Santa Muerte so that your business does wellRitual para incrementar las ventas en tu negocio = Ritual to increase sales in your businessRitual para limpiar tu dinero = Ritual to clean your moneyTres recetas sencillas para obtener dinero = Three simple prescriptions to obtain moneyRitual del chocolate para dominar al amante, novio o esposo = Ritual of chocolate to dominate your lover, fiancé or spouseBaño de la Santa Muerte para el amor = Bath of Santa Muerte for loveNovena para ligar a una persona = Novena to bind a personPara un amor difícil = For a difficult loveAmuleto de la Santa Muerte para tu automóvil = Amulet of Santa Muerte for your automobile (used for protection when buying a vehicle, when suffering frequent vehicle problems, or suffering accidents, or when vehicle is jinxed)Para retirar al mal vecino = To send away a bad neighborRitual para que se alejen las malas amistades de nuestros hijos = Ritual to send away bad friends of your childrenOtro ritual para alejar malas amistades = Another Ritual to send away bad friendsVelación a la Santa Muerte para que nuestros hijos no abandonen los estudios = Prayer to Santa Muerte so that our children do not abandon their studiesVelación para que un matrimonio no se realice = Prayer so that a marriage does not happenThe cult is associated with indigenous peoples, blending Catholic and pagan beliefs. The cult is associated with people on the fringe of Mexican society: slaves, indigenous peoples, the poor, and criminals.If Santa Muerte is associated with one crime in particular, it seems to be kidnapping. In addition to the major drug cartels, the cult also seems to have reached the infamous Latin American youth gangs. Some criminals seem to treat Santa Muerte with a respect that they do not extend to other religious figures.Illegal migrants have been praying to Santa Muerte, carrying images of Santa Muerte in their clothing and giving thanks to her for their crossing.[ It is through these illegal migrants that Santa Muerte seems to be spreading to the U.SThe Santa Muerte cult is anti-establishment and appears to glorify criminal behavior. Although not all members of the cult are criminals, all live an existence that is dominated by crime. The cult seems to be linked closely to prisons, prisoners, and family members of prisoners. It is also associated with at least two organized criminal groups – the Gulf Cartel and the Mara Salvatrucha. Although it does not appear that most practitioners would commit crimes on behalf of the cult, some criminals might use it as an impetus to commit a crime or to increase the scale and violence of their crimes. Furthermore, because of the inherent danger in crime, the invocation of death itself as patron has a manifest appeal.Although not all Santa Muerte cult members are criminals themselves, it would be misleading to describe them as independent of crime. In most cases, if they are not criminals they are people whose lives are touched, if not dominated by crime. If not their own crimes the of family members, neighbors, or people with whom they interact daily.People give numerous reasons for giving offerings to Santa Muerte. Some still consider themselves Catholic. Some say that they are disillusioned with traditional Catholicism. Others say that Santa Muerte has granted miracles and favors that other saints have not. Still others claim that they find Santa Muerte more welcoming because she does not distinguish between good and evil practitioners.
Hidalgo's Army From Celaya to Monte de las CrucesHidalgo was met with an outpouring of support. Intellectuals, liberal priests, and many poor people followed Hidalgo with a great deal of enthusiasm. Hidalgo permitted Indians and Mestizos to join his war in such numbers that the original motives of the Querétaro group were obscured. Allende was Hidalgo's co-conspirator in Querétaro and remained more loyal to the Querétaro group's original, more Creole objectives. However, Hidalgo's actions and the people's response meant that he, not Allende, would lead. Allende had acquired military training when Mexico established a colonial militia; Hidalgo had no military training at all. The people who followed Hidalgo also had no military training, experience, or equipment. Many of these people were poor who were angry after many years of hunger and oppression. Consequently, Hidalgo was the leader of undisciplined rebels.Hidalgo's leadership would also give the insurgent movement a supernatural aspect. Many villagers that joined the insurgent army came to believe that Ferdinand VII himself commanded their loyalty to Hidalgo and the monarch was in New Spain personally directing the rebellion against his own government. They also believed that the king commanded the extermination of all peninsular Spaniards and the division of their property among the masses. Historian Eric Van Young [1] believes that such ideas gave the movement supernatural and religious legitimacy that went as far as messianic expectation.Hidalgo and Allende left Dolores with about 800 men, half of whom were on horseback. They marched through the Bajío area, through Atotonilco, San Miguel el Grande (now Allende), Chamucuero, Celaya, Salamanca, Irapuato and Silao, to Guanajuato. From Guanajuato, Hidalgo directed his troops to Valladolid, Michoacán. They remained here for a while and then decided to march towards Mexico City. From Valladolid, they marched through the State of Mexico, through the cities of Maravatio, Ixtlahuaca, Toluca coming as close to Mexico City as Monte de las Cruces, between the Valley of Toluca and the Valley of Mexico.Just through sheer numbers, Hidalgo's army had some early victories. Hidalgo first went through the economically important and densely populated province of Guanajuato. One of Hidalgo's first stops was at the Sanctuary of Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe in Atotonilco. There Hidalgo affixed an image of the Virgin to a lance to adopt it as his banner. He then inscribed the following slogans to his troops’ flags: "Long live religion! Long live our most Holy Mother of Guadalupe! Long live Ferdinand VII! Long live America and death to bad government!" For the masses of insurgents, this Virgin represented an intense and highly localized religious sensibility. She was invoked to identify allies rather than to create ideological alliances or a sense of nationalism.The extent and the intensity of the movement took vice regal authorities by surprise. San Miguel and Celaya were captured with little resistance. On September 21, 1810, Hidalgo was proclaimed general and supreme commander after arriving to Celaya. At this point, Hidalgo's army numbered about 5,000. However, because of the lack of military discipline, the insurgents soon fell into robbing, looting, and ransacking the towns they were capturing. T hey began to execute prisoners as well. This caused friction between Allende and Hidalgo as early as the capture of San Miguel in late September 1810. When a mob ran through this town, Allende tried to break up the violence by striking at the insurgents with the flat of his sword. This brought a rebuke from Hidalgo, accusing Allende of mistreating the people.On 28 September 1810, Hidalgo arrived to the city of Guanajuato. The town's Spanish and Creole populations took refuge in the heavily-fortified Alhóndiga de Granaditas granary defended by Quartermaster Riaños. The insurgents overwhelmed the defenses in two days and killed an estimated 400 to 600 men, women and children. Allende strongly protested these events and while Hidalgo agreed that they were heinous, he also stated that he understood the historical patterns that shaped such responses. The mass's violence as well as Hidalgo's inability or unwillingness to suppress it caused the Creoles and Peninsulares to ally against the insurgents out of fear. This also caused Hidalgo to lose support from liberal Creoles he might have otherwise have had.From Guanajuato, Hidalgo set off for Valladolid on October, 10, 1810 with 15,000 men. When he arrived at Acámbaro, he was promoted to generalissimo and given the title of “His Most Serene Highness,” with power to legislate. With his new rank he had a blue uniform with a clerical collar and red lapels meticulously embroidered with silver and gold. This uniform also included a black baldric that was also embroidered with gold. There was also a large image of the Virgin of Guadalupe in gold on his chest.Hildago and his forces took Valladolid with little opposition on October, 17,1810. Here, Hidalgo issued proclamations against the Peninsulares, whom he accused of arrogance and despotism, as well as enslaving those in the Americas for almost 300 years. Hidalgo argued that the objective of the war was "to send the Gachupines back to the Motherland" because their greed and tyranny lead to the temporal and spiritual degradation of the Mexicans. Hidalgo forced the bishop of Valladolid, Manuel Abad y Queipo, to rescind the excommunication order he had circulated against him on September 24, 1810. Later, the Inquisition issued an excommunication edict on October 13, 1810 condemning Miguel Hidalgo as a seditionary, apostate, and heretic.The insurgents stayed in the city for some days preparing to march to the capital of New Spain, Mexico City. The canon of the cathedral went unarmed to meet Hidalgo and got him to promise that the atrocities of San Miguel, Celaya and Guanajuato would not be repeated in Valladolid. The canon was partially effective. Wholesale destruction of the city was not repeated. However, Hidalgo was angry when he found the cathedral locked to him. So he jailed all the Spaniards, replaced city officials with his own, and looted the city treasury before marching off toward Mexico City. On October 19th Hidalgo left Valladolid for Mexico City after taking 400,000 pesos from the cathedral to pay expenses.Hidalgo and his troops left the state of Michoacán and marched through the towns of Maravatio, Ixtlahuaca, and Toluca before stopping in the forested mountain area of Monte de las Cruces. Here, insurgent forces engaged Torcuato Trujillo's royalist forces. Hidalgo's troops made royalist troops retreat, but the insurgents suffered heavy casualties for their efforts like they did when they engaged trained royalist soldiers in GuanajuatoThe Retreat from Mexico CityAfter the Battle of Monte de las Cruces on October 30, 1810, Hidalgo still had about 100,000 insurgents and was in a strategic position to attack Mexico City. Numerically, his forces outnumbered royalist forces.The royalist government in Mexico City, under the leadership of Viceroy Francisco Venegas, prepared psychological and military defenses. An intensive propaganda campaign had advertised the insurgent violence in the Bajío area and stressed the insurgents' threat against social stability. Hidalgo found the sedentary Indians and castes of the Valley of Mexico as much opposed to the insurgents as were the Creoles and Spaniards.Hidalgo's forces came as close as what is now the Cuajimalpa borough of Mexico City. Allende wanted to press forward and attack the capital, but Hidalgo disagreed. Hidalgo's reasoning for this decision is unclear and has been debated by historians. One probable factor was that Hidalgo's men were undisciplined and unruly and also suffered heavy losses whenever they encountered trained troops. As the capital was guarded by some of the best-trained soldiers in New Spain, Hidalgo might have feared a bloodbath. Hidalgo instead decided to turn away from Mexico City and move to the north through Toluca and Ixtlahuaca with a final destination of Guadalajara.After turning back, insurgents began to desert. By the time he got to Aculco, just north of Toluca, his army had shrunk to 40,000. There, General Felix Calleja attacked Hidalgo's forces, defeating them on November 7, 1810. Allende decided to take the troops under his command to Guanajuato instead of Guadalajara.Hidalgo arrived in Guadalajara on November 26th with over 7,000 badly-armed men. He initially occupied the city with lower-class support because Hidalgo promised to end slavery, tribute payment and taxes on alcohol and tobacco products. Hidalgo established an alternative government in Guadalajara with himself at the head and then appointed two ministers. On December 6, 1810, Hidalgo issued a decree abolishing slavery, threatening those who did not comply with death. He also abolished tribute payments that the Indians had to pay to their Creole and Peninsular lords. He also ordered the publication of a newspaper called Despertador Americano (American Wake Up Call). He named Pascacio Ortiz de Letona as representative of the insurgent government and sent him to the United States to seek support there. However, this ambassador was apprehended by the Spanish army while in route to Philadelphia and executed.During this time, insurgent violence mounted in Guadalajara. Citizens loyal to the vice regal government were seized and executed. While indiscriminate looting was avoided, the insurgents targeted the property of Creoles and Spaniards, regardless of political affiliation. In the meantime, the royalist army had retaken Guanajuato, forcing Allende to flee to Guadalajara. After he arrived to the city, Allende again objected to Hidalgo concerning the insurgent violence. However, Hidalgo knew the royalist army was on its way to Guadalajara and wanted to stay on good terms with his own army.After Guanajuato had been retaken by royalist forces, the bishop there excommunicated Hidalgo and those under him, declaring them to be heretics, perjurers, and blasphemers on December 24,1810. The Inquisition pronounced an edict against him containing a large number of charges including denying that God punishes sins in this world, doubting the authenticity of the Bible, denouncing the popes and Church government, that Jews should not have to convert to Christianity, denying the perpetual virginity of Mary, preaching that there was no hell and adopting Lutheran doctrine with regards to the Eucharist. Fearful of losing support of his army because of these decrees, Hidalgo responded that he had never departed from Church doctrine in the slightest degree.Royalist forces marched to Guadalajara, arriving in January 1811 with nearly 6,000 men. Allende and Abasolo wanted to concentrate their forces in the city and plan an escape route should they be defeated, but Hidalgo rejected this. Their second choice then was to make a stand at the Calderon Bridge (Puente de Calderon) just outside the city. Hidalgo had between 80,000 and 100,000 men and 95 cannons, but the better trained royalists decisively defeated the insurgent army, forcing Hidalgo to flee towards Aguascalientes. At Hacienda de Pabellon, on January 25, 1811, near Aguascalientes, Allende and other insurgent leaders took military command away from Hidalgo, blaming him for their defeats. Hidalgo remained as head politically but with military command going to Allende. What was left of the insurgent Army of the Americas moved north towards Zacatecas and Saltillo with the goal of making connections with those the United States for support. Hidalgo made it to Saltillo, where he publicly resigned his military post and rejected a pardon offered by General José de la Cruz in the name of Venegas in return for Hidalgo's surrender. A short time later, they were betrayed and captured by royalist Ignacio Elizondo at the Wells of Baján (Norias de Baján) on March 21,1811 and taken to the city of Chihuahua.The Execution of HidalgoHidalgo was turned over to the bishop of Durango, Francisco Gabriel de Olivares, for an official defrocking and excommunication on July 27, 1811. He was then found guilty of treason by a military court and executed by firing squad on July 3oth at 7:00 in the morning. Before his execution, he thanked his jailers, Privates Soldiers Ortega and Melchor, in letters for their humane treatment. At his execution, Hidalgo placed his right hand over his heart to show the riflemen where they should aim. He also refused the use of a blindfold. His body along with the bodies of Allende, Aldama and José Mariano Jiménez were decapitated, and the heads were put on display on the four corners of the Alhóndiga de Granaditas in Guanajuato. The heads remained there for ten years until the end of the Mexican War of Independence to serve as a warning to other insurgents. Hidalgo's headless body was first displayed outside the prison but then buried in the Church of St Francis in Chihuahua. Those remains would later be transferred in 1824 to Mexico City.Hidalgo's death resulted in a political vacuum on the insurgent side. The royalist military commander, General Felix Calleja, continued to pursue rebel troops. Insurgent fighting evolved into guerrilla warfare, and eventually the next major insurgent leader, Jose Maria Morelos y Pavon, who had led rebel movements with Hidalgo, became head of the insurgents. In time the conservatives came to support the revolution and Augtin de Intrubide, a conservative, gained independence from Spanish rule when forces under his command entered Mexico City and established a junta to rule Mexico.Hidalgo's legacyMiguel Hidalgo y Costilla had the unique distinction of being a father in three senses of the word: a priestly father in the Roman Catholic Church, a biological father who produced illegitimate children in defiance of his clerical vows, and the father of his country. Hidalgo is hailed as the Father of the Nation, although it was Agustin de Iturbide, not Hidalgo, who finally obtained Mexico’s independence from Spain on September 27, 1821 when he entered Mexico City and established a junta to govern Mexico. Shortly after gaining independence, the day to celebrate it varied between September 15-16th, the day of Hidalgo's Grito, and September 27th the day Iturbide rode into Mexico City ending Spanish rule. Although Miguel Hidalgo started the war that resulted in Mexico’s independence from Spain he never lived to see Mexico achieve independence. He was captures by Royalist forces and executed on July 30, 1811. For a number of years following the death of Hidalgo and Jose Maria Morelos the revolution was leaderless and ineffective. Guerilla warfare continued being conduced by small independent groups scarred throughout Mexico. A stalemate resulted with Royalist forces gaining supremacy but being unable to completely wipe out the independent revolutionary forces. Spain, faced with domestic unrest and a disintegrating empire, in 1812 adopted constitution promulgated by Spanish liberals.In time Mexican conservatives came to see Spain’s new government as a threat and switched their support to the revolutionary movement. Agustin de Iturbide, a conservative, became the leader of these forces. It was when forces under his command entered Mexico City on September 27, 1821, after the defeat of the forces loyal to Spain, that a governing junta was established and Mexico finally became independent of Spanish rule.Thus it was Agustin de Iturbide, not Miguel Hidalgo, who finally obtained Mexico’s independence from Spain on September 27, 1821. Shortly after gaining independence, the day to celebrate Mexico’s Independence varied between September 15-16th, the day of Hidalgo's Grito, and September 27th the day Iturbide rode into Mexico City ending the Spanish rule over Mexico.Later political movements would favor the more liberal Hidalgo over the conservative Iturbide as the Father of the Mexican Nation. Consequently in time September 16, 1810 became the officially recognized day of Mexican independence. The reason being is that Hidalgo is considered to be precursor and creator of the rest of the heroes of the Mexican War of Independence. Thus there was a time when Austin de Iturbide was seen as the Father of his County and September 27th as Mexico’s Independence Day. It would be as if at one time in American history that Samuel Adams, a leader of the movement that became the American Revolution, was seen as the Father of His Country and October 19th was celebrated as America’s Independence Day because of the surrender of the British forces at Yorktown on October 19, 1781 that ended the American Revolutionary War hostilities. Austin de Iturbide and the September 27th celebrations have become footnotes in Mexican history. Today, of course, it is Miguel Hidalgo who is seen as the Father of the Nation and Mexico’s independence from Spain is celebrated on September 15-16.Hidalgo has become an icon for Mexicans who resist tyranny. Diego Rivera painted Hidalgo's image in half a dozen murals. José Clemente Orozco depicted him with a flaming torch of liberty and considered the painting among his best work. David Alfaro Siqueiros was commissioned by San Nicolas University in Morelia to paint a mural for a celebration commemorating the 200th anniversary of Hidalgo's birth. The town of his parish was renamed Dolores Hidalgo in his honor and the state of Hidalgo was created in 1869.Today Hidalgo is seen as the Father of the Nation and every year on the night of September 15th, the president of Mexico re-enacts the Grito from the balcony of the National Palace at 11 pm as part of Mexico’s two day independence celebration. This scene is repeated by the heads of cities and towns all over Mexico.The remains of Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla lie in the column of the Angel of Independence in Mexico City. Next to it is a lamp lit to represent the sacrifice of those who gave their lives for Mexican Independence.
Mexican Americans, during the Chicano Movement of the 1970s, adopted the holiday for its David vs. Goliath storyline as motivation for civil rights struggles in Texas and California.Cinco de Mayo was celebrated in the US, especially in Texas, long before the civil rights struggles of the 1970s.General Ignacio Zaragosa, who commanded the Mexican forces at the Battle of Puebla, was born in Texas when Texas was part of Mexico. Long before the 1970s Cinco de Mayo was celebrated in the Mexican State of Puebla, where it was fought, and in Texas due to the native son status of General Zaragosa.As Mexican-Americans living in Texas moved north, especially following WWII, they took the Cinco de Mayo celebrations with them. Cinco de Mayo was celebrated in many cities in the US with large Hispanic populations before the civil rights struggles of the 1970s.
What I always wondered is what would have happened had their roles been reversed? Lee commanding the Union forces and Grant the southern? Would the outcome have been the same?
...the increasing mechanization of agriculture would have made the slave economy unsustainable after about 1900...
I disagree.Even today American agriculture is dependent on the cheap labor of uneducated, unskilled illegal aliens. So I don't see mechanization as making the slave economy unsustainable by 1900. (I also note that sharecropping--a method adopted to continue slavery in all but name--still exists in the South.)I do think that without the Civil War slavery would eventually have ended. But I think it is far more likely that it would have ended due to something akin to the pressure the world put on South Africa to end apartheid than because the South voluntarily changed its agricultural practices.
A knock on effect is that technology requires education, and given that slave-owners deliberately tried to limit the education of slaves exactly how useful would they be in an increasingly mechanistic society.
Again, with respect I don’t see the South has having been moving in the direction of a technological society. Yes, the South was using the cotton gin, but they remained an agricultural society. Furthermore, a technological society does not require all workers to be skilled and/or educated. Look at what the assembly line did to craftsmanship. So I reject the idea that technology would eventually have required the education of the slaves.
Simple logic and common sense tells us that slavery could not continue indefinitely in the US given the direction the country was developing. The question was whether organic processes or war would end the practice. I stand by my assertion that the war was avoidable and the South was not ultimately at fault.
Again, I respectfully disagree. I don’t think that—as you previously stated—slavery would have died out within a few decades. I don’t think anything short of Civil War would have ended slavery within the lifetime of those living in 1861.
I am not going to go into the myriad issues with using Wikipedia for anything to be taken seriously.
I agree that while quoting Wikipedia is quick, fun, and easy it is not normally the best of sources.However, I don’t think that discredits the facts I’m using support my opinion that slavery was increasing, not dying. Which include:--The cotton gin was invented in 1793.--The South became even more dependent on plantations and slavery, with plantation agriculture becoming the largest sector of the Southern economy.--The number of slaves rose in concert with the increase in cotton production, increasing from around 700,000 in 1790 to around 3.2 million in 1850. --In 1790 there were six slave states; in 1860 there were 15.--By 1860 approximately one in three Southerners was a slave.So once again, I reject your assertion that without the Civil War "slavery would have died a natural death within a few decades because of economic factors." I believe the facts I cited above (as contained in the Wikipedia article I cited) establish that—due to the cotton gin—prior to the Civil War slavery was increasing, not dying.
If they had been left a lone, slavery would have died a natural death within a few decades
With respect, I disagree. Slavery was expanding, not dying. In 1790 there were 700,000 slaves; in 1850 there were 3.2 million slaves. In 1790 there were six slave states; in 1860 there were 15 slave states. Without the Civil War I do not think the South would have ended slavery.
The invention of the Cotton Gin spelled doom for southern slavery right there.
Again, I disagree. Thanks to the cotton gin the production of cotton expanded from 750,000 bales in 1830 to 2.85 million bales in 1850. The cotton gin made slavery very profitable. Prior to the cotton gin I think slavery was dying. After the cotton gin I do not think anything short of the Civil War would have ended slavery.
Prior to the introduction of the mechanical cotton gin, cotton had required considerable labor to clean and separate the fibers from the seeds.[9] With Eli Whitney’s introduction of “teeth” in his cotton gin to comb out the cotton and separate the seeds, cotton became a tremendously profitable business, creating many fortunes in the Antebellum South. New Orleans and Galveston were shipping points that derived substantial economic benefit from cotton raised throughout the South. Additionally, the greatly expanded supply of cotton created strong demand for textile machinery and improved machine designs that replaced wooden parts with metal. This led to the invention of many machine tools in the early 19th century.[10]The invention of the cotton gin caused massive growth in the production of cotton in the United States, concentrated mostly in the South. Cotton production expanded from 750,000 bales in 1830 to 2.85 million bales in 1850. As a result, the South became even more dependent on plantations and slavery, with plantation agriculture becoming the largest sector of the Southern economy.[11] The number of slaves rose in concert with the increase in cotton production, increasing from around 700,000 in 1790 to around 3.2 million in 1850.[12] By 1860, the southern states were providing two-thirds of the world’s supply of cotton, and up to eighty percent of the crucial British market.[13]According to the Eli Whitney Museum website: Whitney (who died in 1825) could not have foreseen the ways in which his invention would change society for the worse. The most significant of these was the growth of slavery. While it was true that the cotton gin reduced the labor of removing seeds, it did not reduce the need for slaves to grow and pick the cotton. In fact, the opposite occurred. Cotton growing became so profitable for the planters that it greatly increased their demand for both land and slave labor. In 1790 there were six slave states; in 1860 there were 15. From 1790 until Congress banned the importation of slaves from Africa in 1808, Southerners imported 80,000 Africans. By 1860 approximately one in three Southerners was a slave.[14]Due to its inadvertent effect on American slavery, the invention of the cotton gin is frequently cited as one of the ultimate causes of the American Civil War.[15][16][17]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cotton_gin
Christ’s Birth, Death & Resurrection Dates – Part 3 of 3
It is important to note that following the death of Sejanus in October of 31 A.D that Pilate was most conciliatory when confronted with Jewish demands. Prior to that time the Jews had found him inflexible. Thus a crucifixion date after 31 A.D. is more plausible than an earlier date. An understanding of the Jewish lunisolar calendar is helpful in evaluating possible dates for the crucifixion. In the Jewish calendar, years are based upon the movements of the sun while the moon determines the months. Months begin the first evening that the slim crescent of the new moon becomes visible. Days are measured from evening until the following evening. The lunar calendar is tied to the solar calendar through the selection of the month of Nisan. The month of Nisan, the first month of the Jewish calendar, is the first month to begin following the spring equinox, when the sun rises the closest to due east. Thus the feast of Unleavened Bread and the Passover can never occur prior to the spring equinox. Since twelve lunar months are about eleven days short of a solar year about every three years a thirteenth or “leap month” is added to the lunisolar year. (In somewhat the same way February 29th is added to our calendar every fourth year.) All the Gospel writers state that Christ was crucified on a day of preparation preceding a Sabbath. (See Matthew 27:62, Mark 15:42, Luke 23:54 and John 19:42.) A Sabbath could be either the weekly Sabbath (a Saturday) or a feast day. It is important to understand that in Biblical times the Jews counted inclusively. Thus, according to the Jewish manner of reckoning time, any part of Friday, Saturday, and any part of Sunday would be counted as three days and three nights. John specifically states the day of preparation on which Christ was crucified was the day of preparation for the Passover. (See John 19:14.) All the Gospel writers are in agreement that Christ rose from the dead on the first day of week, which we call Sunday. Furthermore, he was hurriedly laid in his tomb because of the approaching Sabbath. The women returned on Sunday to finish the task of anointing and preparing his body for internment only to find he has risen from the dead. Thus I am comfortable with the traditional view that Christ was crucified on a Friday and rose from the dead on a Sunday with the intervening Saturday being both the weekly Sabbath and a Passover. Traditionally the Pascal lamb was slain on day of preparation for the Passover. It should be noted that Christ had prophesied that he would rise from the dead within three days. Hence it is necessary to select a three-day period that both allows Christ to have been crucified on the day of preparation for Passover—in harmony with the symbolism of his being the Pascal lamb—and well as his rising from the dead on a Sunday as many witnesses testified happened. Thus a Saturday Passover is required to comply with the prophecy that Christ would rise from the dead in three days, the symbolism that Jesus is the Pascal lamb, and the testimony of witness that the Savior rose from the dead on a Sunday. The symbolism of Christ as the Pascal lamb, the author feels, should be given considerable importance. If Christ were crucified on a Friday preceding a Saturday Passover he would have been crucified at the same time the Pascal lambs were slain for the Passover meal. This is another reason the author feels Christ was crucified on a Friday preceding a Saturday Passover. The following table lists some of the important symbolism that adds weight to the selection of this day for the crucifixion.Modern Date Jewish Date Passover Event Event in Christ’s LifeMonday, March 28, 33 10 Nisan Passover lamb chosen Triumphal entry proclaiming Jesus to be the MessiahFriday, April 1, 33 AD 14 Nisan Lamb sacrificed Christ’s Crucifixion – Lamb of God slain for sins of the worldSaturday, April 2, 33 15 Nisan Feast commemorating the liberation from bondage in Egypt Salvation preached to the captives in the sprit worldSunday, April 3, 33 AD 16 Nisan First fruits of the harvest presented to the Lord First fruits of the resurrection come forth The following table shows the day of preparation preceding Passover during the years that Pilate was governor of Judea and Caiaphas was high priest. Day of Preparation (14 Nisan) Year Day Date26 AD Sunday April 19, 1 AD27 AD Thursday April 8, 27 AD28 AD Tuesday March 28, 28 AD29 AD Monday April 16, 29 AD30 AD Friday April 5, 20 AD31 AD Tuesday March 25, 31 AD32 AD Sunday April 11, 32 AD33 AD Friday April 1, 33 AD34 AD Wednesday March 22, 34 AD35 AD Tuesday April 10, 35 AD36 AD Saturday March 29, 36 AD As can be seen, the only years in which the day of preparation for the Passover fell on a Friday were in 30 A.D. and 33 A.D. Remember that Pilate’s conciliatory behavior favors a date after 31 A.D. The year 33 A.D. is clearly the better candidate for Christ’s death and resurrection for additional reasons as will be explained below. The scriptures indicate the sun was darkened for three hours at the crucifixion. Peter’s remarks (Acts 2:20) about the sun darkening and the moon turning to blood are often thought to also refer to events accompanying the crucifixion. Because the Jews use a lunisolar calendar, on 14 Nisan (the day of preparation preceding Passover) the moon is always full. Solar eclipses occur when the moon is new, not full. However, a lunar eclipse can occur at a full moon, which causes the moon to turn a dark reddish color. No known lunar eclipse or other astronomical event that would make the sun appear darkened and/or the moon turn to blood was visible in Judea during the 30 A.D. Passover. That is not the case, however, with the 33 A.D. Passover. There was a lunar eclipse lasting at least 30 minutes visible in Jerusalem on Friday, April 1, 33 A.D. Furthermore, because the Jews were likely to have been looking for the full moon beginning Passover it is probable the 33 A.D. lunar eclipse was widely observed. This 33 A.D. eclipse is consistent with statements of the sun being darkened and the moon turning to blood. Thus the best candidate for the date on which Christ was crucified is Friday, April 1, 33 A.D.If Christ were crucified on Friday, April 1, 33 AD—as seems likely—it is completely compatible with a birth date just before Passover in 1 B.C since Christ would be 33-34 years old, which is consistent with his having been baptized about age 30. A birth date of 7-6 B.C. or even 4 B.C. does not provide this same internal consistency with either a 30 A.D. or 33 A.D. crucifixion. These conclusions are totally consistent with the work of the sixth century scholar Dionysis Exiguus who calculated that Christ was born in 1 B.C. If Christ had actually been born in 7-6 B.C. or even 4 B.C. no satisfactory answer has ever been given to the question of how he made an error of such magnitude. It should be remembered that in addition to the works of Josephus he probably had access to other materials that are no longer available to scholars. For the reasons cited above, this author feels that a birth date shortly before Passover in 1 B.C. combined with a crucifixion during the 33 A.D Passover fit the preponderance of the known historical and astronomical evidence regarding the life of Christ. The author of this paper feels that if the reader carefully reviews the criteria of what is known about the life of Christ (as listed at the beginning of this paper) that the reader will also concluded these are the most probable dates for the birth and death of Jesus Christ. SourcesLevy, David and Wendee, Cosmic Discoveries, published by Prometheus Books.Pratt, John P. “Yet Another Eclipse for Herod,” The Planetarian, vol. 19, no. 4, Dec. 1990, pp. 8-14.Shanks, Hershel, editor. Ancient Israel: From Abraham to the Roman Destruction of the Temple, BiblicalArchaeology Society: Washington, D.C., 1999.
Christ’s Birth, Death & Resurrection Dates – Part 2 of 3
Is it possible that Josephus was unaware that Herod’s successors antedated the commencement of their reigns? There are two possible answers. One is that it was not politically expedient for him to publicly expose their practice, which resulted in his “cooking the books.” The second is that he was unaware of what happened. Josephus devotes 30 chapters to Herod the Great. In contrast his successors are scarcely mentioned. Thus it appears well within the realm of probability that Josephus was unaware that Herod’s successors antedated the date on which they claimed to have commenced their reign. (It should also be remembers these events did not occur during the adult life of Josephus. Josephus’s situation is somewhat analogous to a veteran of Desert Storm writing about World War One.)The earliest coins found for any of Herod’s successors is “year 5.” This is exactly what would be expected if they had claimed to have begun their rule in 4 B.C. but had not actually coined money until 1 A.D.—the year they truthfully began to reign. As mentioned above, Josephus says that Varus was governor of Syria at the time of Herod’s death. It is not known who was governor of Syria around 1 A.D. However, an inscription found near the villa of Varus speaks of a man who was twice governor of Syria. It therefore seems safe to conclude that Varus was twice governor of Syria. The first time around 6-5 B.C. and the second around 1 A.D. As stated above, the 8 B.C. taxation only applied to Roman citizens. Supporters of the 4 B.C. death date for Herod’s death think it was the census requiring Mary and Joseph to undertake their journey to Bethlehem. There is a better option. On February 5, 2 B.C. the Roman Senate awarded Augustas Caesar the title of “Pater Patriae” (Father of the Country). It is thought by many that the census mentioned by Luke also required an oath of allegiance to Augustus Caesar. Josephus states that a year or so before Herod died that over 6,000 Pharisees refused to pledge their good will to Caesar. If an oath was administered as part of the census it is easy to understand how Josephus knew the number of non-compliant Pharisees; without a census it would be more formidable task. Orosius, a fifth century historian, also links an oath of allegiance to the census. He identifies the census as occurring in 2 B.C. Conducting a census took a long period of time, as it required both informing provincial leaders of what was expected as well as enrolling all the subjects of the empire. Consequently this 2 B.C. census seems a perfect fit for the census mentioned by Luke if Christ were born in the spring of 1 B.C. Refusing to take the oath of allegiance accompanying the 2 B.C. census might also explain the death of the Jewish patriots at a lunar eclipse preceding Herod’s death. It should also be noted that Luke’s phrase “in those days a decree went forth” refers back to the birth of John the Baptist, in 2 B.C., making this an even better fit for the census that brought Mary and Joseph to Bethlehem so Joseph could be counted as being of the house and linage of David. One possibility for the Star of Bethlehem deserves serious consideration. On June 17, 2 B.C. there was a conjunction of Jupiter and Venus rear the king-star, Regulus, in Leo. The two planets seemed to merge. In the 2000 years before and after this 2 B.C. conjunction there has never been another such perfect conjunction of Jupiter and Venus near Regulus. The sign of the tribe of Judah, of course, is the lion. Regulus, within Leo, is associated both with kings and with the kingdom of Judah. Jupiter was the father god and was often associated with the birth of kings. Venus was the mother god as well as the goddess of love and fertility. Thus it is likely that the Magi seeing Jupiter and Venus join together in “marriage union” near Regulus would predict, not the birth of a king of Judah, but rather the conception of the king of Judah. This explanation for the Star of Bethlehem fits well for a 1 B.C. birth of Christ. It also supports two ancient Christian traditions mentioned by a fourth century churchman named Epipanius. The first is that Christ was conceived on June 20th, which is very close to the June 17th conjunction. The second is that Mary’s pregnancy lasted 10 months. There was a Passover feast on April 9, 1 B.C. The Law of Moses was interpreted as requiring parents to present a newborn child at the temple within 40 days of birth. It is likely that Joseph and Mary would combine their enrollment in the Roman census together with a Passover visit to Jerusalem. A trip to Jerusalem for Passover is the likely reason there was “no room at the inn” for them. Jerusalem was always packed during Passover. The uncertainties of travel being what they were in those days it is likely Mary and Joseph would try to arrive in Jerusalem a few days prior to Passover. Thus a birth date for Jesus early in April of 1 B.C. seems probable, as that would put Mary and Joseph in Bethlehem shortly before Passover. (Bethlehem is a suburb of Jerusalem located about 5 miles distant from the center of the larger city. Then as now, those residing in the surrounding suburbs were consider to be “in Jerusalem” for Passover.) Shepherds are recorded as tending their flocks by night. This is a common practice during the lambing season. A Passover birth would coincide with the spring lambing season. The Biblical mention of shepherds tending their flocks by night is consistent with a Passover birth in 1 B.C. If the “new star” was indeed a sign of Christ’s conception, rather than his birth, it might also help explain other events. It would explain how the Magi had sufficient time to arrive when the Christ child was still an infant in or near Bethlehem. Especially when one considers that it is likely Mary and Joseph would remain near Jerusalem in order to be able to present Jesus at the temple 40 days following his birth as was required by the Law of Moses. Herod is reported to have killed the male infants of Bethlehem under age two after receiving the Magi. It is likely that he wanted to take no chance that the Magi made an error. Herod might have feared that an earlier conjunction—perhaps that of September 14, 3 B.C.—was the sign of either Christ’s conception or birth. There were other events in the skies during the pervious years that might also had made him select age two in order to be sure his perceived rival did not escape. They are worth discussing as they also help us to understand why the Magi would view the June 17, 2 B.C. conjunction as the sign of Christ’s conception.Jupiter is brighter in the night sky than any star or planet except Venus. As viewed from the Earth, planets generally move eastward through a series of constellations known as the Zodiac. However, planets do not always move eastward, sometimes they move westward for a few months before again moving eastward. This westward movement is known as retrograde motion. (Retrograde motion occurs in the planets that are further from the Sun than is the Earth because these planets take longer to complete their orbit. For example, Jupiter appears to move eastward until the Earth overtakes it in its orbit, then for a time Jupiter appears to move westward. The effect is similar to what a person experiences when traveling in a car that overtakes another car. At the moment the faster car overtakes the slower car, the slower car appears to move backward.) Astronomers tell us that on September 14, 3 B.C., Jupiter appeared to pass very close to the star Regulus, “the King’s star.” This conjunction of Jupiter and Regulus appeared in the eastern sky. In the following months at first Jupiter continued its eastward movement, it then—as viewed form the Earth—it stopped and moved westward for a period of time. On February 17, 2 B.C. Jupiter passed even closer to Regulus than it had on September 14, 3 B.C. On May 8, 2 B.C. Jupiter passed Regulus a third time. Thus, over a period of nearly eight months the Magi saw Jupiter appear to draw a circle, or crown, above “the King’s star,” beginning in the east. Astrologers would probably have predicated the coming birth of a king in Judea after observing this movement. Then on the evening of June 17, 2 B.C. as the sky became dark over Babylonia, Jupiter and Venus drew closer and closer together until at 8:51 p.m. that night over Babylon they appeared to merge into a single, brilliant star—a marriage union—in the western sky. It would to be seen as pointing towards Bethlehem. Thus it is likely the Magi concluded that a new king of Jews, the promised Messiah, had been conceived and shortly thereafter began their journey to worship him. It is possible a ten-month pregnancy was needed for the Magi to arrive in Jerusalem when Jesus was born. Or that with a shorter pregnancy Mary would have delivered in Nazareth. (Information regarding the above conjunctions is taken from Cosmic Discoveries, by David and Wendee Levy, published by Prometheus Books. The author of this paper is responsible for the conclusions.) The only date given in the Gospels that can be cross referenced with external dating systems is given by Luke (3:1) when he states that John the Baptist began his ministry “in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar.” Luke (3:23) also indicates that shortly after John the Baptist began his ministry that Jesus went to him to be baptized. Additionally we are told that Jesus was about 30 years of age when he was baptized. As has been mentioned before, attainment of age 30 was required under the Law of Moses for commencement of the work performed by both John and Jesus. It would be incongruous with the rest of his life for Christ to delay beginning his ministry past age 30. That John and Jesus would both delay the commencement of their ministry, and delay it the same number of years, seems highly unlikely. Following Christ’s baptism the Gospels record that Jesus spent forty days in the wilderness where he finished preparing for his mortal ministry. The probability is Jesus was baptized shortly before his thirtieth birthday and emerged from the wilderness shortly after turning thirty, at which time he began his ministry. It is most likely that the 15th year of Tiberius was calculated from the death of Augustus in 14 A.D. If so, John the Baptist began his ministry between August/September 28 A.D. and August/September 29. A.D. Some have suggested that Tiberius calculated his reign from his co-regency with Augustus. The early Christian writer Tertullian used both methods. With the expectation of Tertullian (who used both methods), there are no documents, coins, or other evidence that Tiberius calculated his reign from his co-regency. Thus it is most likely Christ was baptized in 28 or 29 A.D. when he was nearing his 30th birthday. This is consistent with his birth having occurred in 1 B.C. and his crucifixion in 33 A.D. The Gospel of John specifically names three Passovers, including the one that occurred when Christ was crucified. (See John 2:13, John 6:4, and John 11:55.) John also implies an extra year between the first two Passovers because he discusses a spring harvest plus another Jewish feast is mentioned. (See John 4:35,45) Consequently it is generally accepted that Christ’s mortal ministry lasted not less than three and one-half years and included at least four Passovers. If Christ were baptized about age thirty and his mortal ministry lasted between three and four years then he should have been 33 or 34 at the time of his death. This is totally consistent with a birth shortly before Passover in 1 B.C. and crucifixion during the 33 A.D. Passover. When Christ was crucified, Pilate was the Roman procurator and Caiaphas was the Jewish high priest. Historical records indicate this means the crucifixion had to have occurred between 26 and 36 A.D. If Christ began his ministry in 28-29 A.D. when he was about 30 and in the 15th (or 16th) year of the reign of Tiberius then after four Passovers had passed it would indicate he was crucified in 32-33 A.D. If his ministry were to have begun in 26 A.D. (as would be the case if his ministry were reckoned from the co-regency of Tiberias) then Christ was crucified about 29 A.D. Thus the internal dating of Gospels is consistent with secular records regarding the date of the crucifixion.
Today we cannot know with certainty what was the phenomenon the Magi saw that caused them to journey to Judea and worship the Christ child. It may have been a comet, a meteorite or a new star never before seen. However, our knowledge of astronomy makes the movements of Jupiter two millennia ago a likely candidate for the Star the Bethlehem. Jupiter is brighter in the night sky than any star or planet except Venus. As viewed from the Earth, planets generally move eastward through a series of constellations known as the Zodiac. However, planets do not always move eastward, sometimes they move westward for a few months before again moving eastward. This westward movement is known as retrograde motion. (Retrograde motion occurs in the planets that are further from the Sun than the Earth because these planets take longer to complete their orbit. For example, Jupiter appears to move eastward until the Earth overtakes Jupiter in its orbit and then for a time Jupiter appears to move westward. The effect is similar to what a person experiences when traveling in a car that overtakes another car. At the moment faster car overtakes the slower car, the slower car appears to move backward.) The observations of ancient astronomers probably arose from the needs of ancient societies. For example, the motion of the star Sirius was used to predict annual flooding of the river Nile. The early evening rising of Capella (the goat star) was a sign of winter storms on the Mediterranean. No doubt such astronomical phenomena gave rise to astrological beliefs such as the movement of the stars foretelling the future of man. When two planets—or a planet and star—get close together the event is called a conjunction. Today state-of-art planetariums can reconstruct the appearance of the sky on any given night in history and tell us some interesting things about the movement of Jupiter long ago. Astronomers tell us that on September 14, 3 B.C., Jupiter appeared to pass very close to the star Regulus, “the King’s star.” This conjunction of Jupiter and Regulus appeared in the eastern sky. In the following months at first Jupiter continued its eastward movement, it then—as viewed from the Earth—it stopped and moved westward for a period of time. On February 17, 2 B.C. Jupiter passed even closer to Regulus than it had on September 14, 3 B.C. On May 8, 2 B.C. Jupiter passed Regulus a third time. Thus, over a period of nearly eight months the Magi saw Jupiter appear to draw a circle, or crown, above “the King’s star,” beginning in the east. Astrologers would probably have predicated a royal birth in Judea after observing this movement. Additionally, on the evening of June 17, 2 B.C. as the sky became dark over Babylonia, Jupiter and Venus drew closer and closer together until at 8:51 p.m. that night over Babylon they appeared to merge into a single, brilliant star in the western sky which would to be seen as pointing towards Bethlehem. (For further information see, David and Wendee Levy, Cosmic Discoveries, published by Prometheus Books.) Of additional interest is the movement of Jupiter, Saturn, and Mars. Every 794 years, 4 months and 12 days the planets appear to merge. In 4 B.C. the place where these planets would appear to have merged into a single planet (or star) was Bethlehem of Judea. Serious consideration should be give to the June 17, 2 B.C. conjunction of Jupiter and Venus rear the king-star Regulus in Leo as being the Star of Bethlehem. Additionally, it is likely that it was the sign of Christ’s conception, not his birth. In the 2000 years before and after this 2 B.C. conjunction, when Jupiter and Venus seemed to merge, there has never been another such perfect conjunction of these two planets near Regulus. The sign of the tribe of Judah, of course, is the lion. Regulus, within Leo, is associated both with kings and with the kingdom of Judah. Jupiter was the father god and was often associated with the birth of kings. Venus was the mother god as well as the goddess of love and fertility. Thus it is likely that the Magi seeing Jupiter and Venus join together in a “marriage union” near Regulus would predict, not the birth of a king of Judah, but rather the conception of the king of Judah. It also supports two ancient Christian traditions mentioned by a fourth century churchman named Epipanius. The first is that Christ was conceived on June 20th, which is very close to the June 17th conjunction. The second is that Mary’s pregnancy lasted 10 months. (It is possible a ten-month pregnancy was needed for the Magi to arrive in Jerusalem when Jesus was born. Also that with a shorter pregnancy Mary would have delivered in Nazareth.) There was a Passover feast on April 9, 1 B.C. The Law of Moses was interpreted as requiring parents to present a newborn child at the temple within 40 days of birth. It is likely that Joseph and Mary would combine their enrollment in the Roman census together with a Passover visit to Jerusalem. A trip to Jerusalem for Passover is the likely reason there was “no room at the inn” for them. Jerusalem was always packed during Passover. The uncertainties of travel being what they were in those days it is likely Mary and Joseph would try to arrive in Jerusalem a few days prior to Passover. Thus a birth date for Jesus early in April of 1 B.C. seems probable, as that would put Mary and Joseph in Bethlehem shortly before Passover. (Bethlehem is a suburb of Jerusalem located about 5 miles distant from the center of the larger city. Then as now, those residing in the surrounding suburbs were consider to be “in Jerusalem” for Passover.) Shepherds are recorded as tending their flocks by night. This is a common practice during the lambing season. A Passover birth would coincide with the spring lambing season. The Biblical mention of shepherds tending their flocks by night is consistent with a Passover birth in 1 B.C. (Remember there was no year zero. For Christ to be one year old on his birthday in 1 A.D. he would have to have been born in 1 B.C. For further information supporting a 1 B.C. birth, please see the notes concerning the subject.) If the “new star” was indeed a sign of Christ’s conception, rather than his birth, it might also help explain other events. It would explain how the Magi had sufficient time to arrive when the Christ child was still an infant in or near Bethlehem. Especially when one considers that it is likely Mary and Joseph would remain near Jerusalem in order to be able to present Jesus at the temple forty days following his birth as was required by the Law of Moses. Herod is reported to have killed the male infants of Bethlehem under age two after receiving the Magi. It is likely that he wanted to take no chance that the Magi made an error. Herod might have feared that an earlier conjunction—perhaps that of September 14, 3 B.C.—was the sign of either Christ’s conception or birth. On the evening of June 17, 2 B.C., as the sky became dark over Babylonia, the planets Jupiter and Venus drew closer and closer together until at 8:51 p.m. that night over Babylon they appeared to merge into a single, brilliant star—a marriage union—in the western sky. What today we call the Star of Bethlehem would have seen by Babylonian astronomers as pointing directly towards Bethlehem. It is likely the Magi concluded that a new king of Jews, the promised Messiah, had been conceived and shortly thereafter began their journey to worship him.
I think that had the (deep) South kept to itself there wouldn't have been a Civil War. (And that means staying within, say, the 1850 boundaries.)However, I don't think it was possible for the (deep) South to keep to itself--without changes they would never have accepted. Cotton depleats soil; in that era new land was necessary to maintain a cotton based economy as they didn't know how to rejuvenate the soil. I don't see the (deep) South abandoning a cotton based economy. I also don't see the (deep) South being willing to make the changes that would have been necessary to have a cotton based economy without slavery. Hence I don't see it having been possible for the South to have kept to itself.
I said the death rate was upwards of 25% In what follows the Roman death-rate is estimated at 33-50%.What ever the actual rate, it was a significant--if not primary--cause for the fall of the Roman Empire in the West.
Between 166 and 266 AD the Roman Empire was hit by two separate plagues, each one nearly as deadly as the more famous Black Death of the Middle Ages.The first one, known as the Antonine Plague lasted eighteen years and killed millions of people all over the empire. It may have even killed the famous Marcus Aurelius, the philosopher and soldier, last of the Good Emperors.The second Plague broke out in 251 AD and raged for fifteen years right in the middle of the dreadful 3rd Century Crisis which it may well have started or at least deepened.It is believed that the two diseases were Smallpox and Measles, both virulent killers though which order they came in is not known.This carnage may have unbalanced Classical Civilization: physically by removing taxpayers, workers and recruits necessary to maintain the Roman Social Order and it's army at their accustomed level; and psychologically by showing the helplessness of its rulers and religions in the face of catastrophe. This might well have caused millions of bereaved survivors to turn away from Paganism to Christianity and similar other-worldly religions and philosophies.Their effects lasted for centuries and the population of the Mediterranean World fell for about 800 years before recovery began.By killing more Romans than Barbarians and Civil Wars combined, by an order of magnitude, these catastrophes may have been the trigger for the fall of Rome and the eclipse of Classical Civilization.Given what we know of the ravages of Smallpox on the Indian inhabitants of the Americas after 1492, where death rates are estimated at 80-90% of effected populations, this seems all too likely; although it seems the Roman death-rate was more in the vicinity of 33-50%.No culture, especially one with such a low level of technology--it is not widely appreciated how primitive Classical technology was, even in comparison to the Middle Ages--could hope to survive a disaster of this magnitude.The clincher was an outbreak of Bubonic Plague, the Plague of Justinian starting 541 AD, which ravaged the Mediterranean World about half a century after the Fall of Rome. This paved the way for the Rise of Islam and by dividing the Mediterranean World permanently between two hostile religions, ensured that nothing like the Roman Empire could never exist again.Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_kind_of_plagues_have_been_in_the_Roman_Empire#ixzz1jUimpTAn
Very interesting.In the Ken Burns series on the Civil War there is a scene about a reunion long after the war ended of Blue and Gray veterans. In this scene one of the Confederate veterans teases a Union veteran with a soto voice yell that I believe is a softly uttered Rebel yell.