i am not sure if you are aware of it, there are many people in South East Asia and in the Whole of the Middle East who views USA as the real terrorists.Especially to the muslims from Asia, when you ask them on the 911 incident, they really view it as that the american trully deserve it. they are not worth to be pitied or symphatized. They can even say that 911 is peanuts as compared to what the americans has done to others. let us look as USA. their history is short. but perhaps it just might be possible that they are war lovers or maybe not. throughout history, since their existance, how many civil wars to continent wars in the american continent to wars outside of american continent have the americans fought? it is too many ! Especially during the years of president bush, it was the worst ! too many people both within USA and outside of USA dislike him like anything. most likely it is the americans who has bases and soldiers in almost any nations around the world today. which other nation is also like them? very few i would say. which nation in this world gives the general feeling to most people as the most active and war supporter type? the answer is USA. which nation in this world is always fond of showing off their military might and power to the rest of the world? the answer should be obvious. Which nation in this world use military as the first few source and means to warn and threaten any other nation to get what they want instead of peaceful and diplomatic talks first? some years ago, the people of indonesia raped the indonesian chinese girls. China was extremely angry like anything. she gave indonesia a warning telling the government to do something to end it and to protect the chinese there. nothing else more to that. However , i do feel very confident that if the same thing happen to the Americans there, the first thing without a second word will the airforce and navy that will be dispatched by USA to indonesia. any other things else is secondary. don't forget again, who threw the whole world into financial and economic crisis in history? talk about the most recent one that the world is expericing. the culprit is USA. but again who save the world from this crisis? it is China. USA today owes China alot of money now!do feel free to rebuke if you disagree with what i have stated about USA and how others view of USA.

perhaps in some sense you just might be correct that these people natural rulers or businessman.

So it's in your deepest nature, your naturel destiny ...- I can't really understand you because I don't speak your language or is it just that I'm not Han ?- Just looking for some links with google isn't a reference, I was expecting you to give me some credible authors.- Vietnamese kicked the Chinese empire many times, I wonder why they are so reluctant to your peaceful Han kindnessNo serious evidence so far.However I understand why Singapore is so praised : a great tiger about economy but not a military threat.  Moreover Singapore has the largest majority overseas Han Chinese population at 78%.You've just confirmed what I was suspecting about you, Propaganda Kamarade.At least Ivkhan doesn't seem dangerous.

I cannot Change what you choose to think. What you choose to think and what things really are can be different things at times. they are not always the same. I personally do not buy too much on numbers, stastics, figures, graphs and charts. it does not really prove or mean anything. at too many times these are use to wool over the eyes of many people and to mislead or confuse people. typically people in the advertising, marketing, sales and finance industry love to use such things best and i am familiar with their tatics and tricks. at times even the media and government also use such things as well.you really rather belive in authors and testimonies made by people? myself , base on life experiences i do not buy much on such things. these are people in alot of scenerios who are trying to use their influences, relationships with a person, sales speech, etc........ to get people to believe in what they want them to people in.and by the way i said " perhaps " perhaps this english word does not mean " YES " it is only in terms of numbers and historical records that the majority are such but it does not mean all of them are. If it is really all are such, can you really imagine what the world will be turned into? there are still some who are not. it is only a perhaps yes or perhaps no or perhaps by coinsicidence or perhaps this word perhaps can be anything. you are definately jumping into conclusion too fast. as to singapre wise, there are too many things they are world number 1 !singapore of course don have military threat. but however in the whole of south east asia, in terms of miliary technology, singapore has all the best and strongest. However, as to how soldier are the soldiers of singapore really are, i can tell you that they are not really soldiers at all. In fact far from it. Instead, there are some contract and treaties sign with western powers in which in times of war, they have agreed to send their men to protect and defend singapore against her enemies. this is something that many people are unaware off. the system works this way, in real times of war, the military of the westerners inside of singapore will be the first to go to the battlefield. the next will the singapore reservist units and then followed by those who still currently serving their national service. in the whole process of everything, the next wave of renforcements of the foreigners will arrive to continue their protection for singapore.  There is no such need for singapore to be strong in military. even the government of singapore also know that they cannot rely and trust on their own people to protect themselves and that the real ones are the westerners. in the usual case those nations strong in military and who are real military threat are those communist nations. communist nations are very strong and powerful in military. sometimes from the way how the soldiers march you can tell their strength. look at the marching of the Chinese, the Russians, the North Koreans etc... as compared to south korea and Singapore. the differences is too obvious. However, there are too many things about singapore that is full of cover ups and propaganda as well by the media and government of singapore. perhaps you are not aware of it. in terms of the media, ( the papers, the radio, the TV , magazines, & education etc...) they are all under the absolute fullest and tightest control of the singapore government. anything that is harmful to themselves will not be released. that is it is only the good things and none of the bad to the public and foreigners. there are also secret police as well out to nap people who gives current ruling government of singapore a bad name as well. if such people are found, the next day, these people will become the next missing people of singapore in the records of police file as missing and unfound. the current oppositions of singapore can never ever win. whenever anyone who is strong in the opposition appears, before this person is of any stronger, this person will be elimiated politically for good by the ruling government ! what that is left is all the weak and useless ones in the opposition for show only to others that singapore also have oppositions. whenever voting comes, everyone all knows that the opposition can never win, as the ruling party always cheats. however there is nothing that can be done about it. singapore is not completely so much of a freedom of speech. much of it is for show only. there is a limit to their freedom of speech. if people go beyond this limit , they are in serious danger. in singapore, the government seriously discourages people to be involved or to have interest in politics. they do not want people to have interest or involvement in politics. they only people to have such is themselves only and no one else. More or less, there is some " LEE DYNASTY " thing going on in the governing of singapore.

If you truly understand the culture, characteristics and history of the HAN chinese, they are peace makers. they are not war minded. they are friendly. where else other chinese such as the Mongols, Manchurians, Kithians etc... they are very super War minded and can fight a war better than the Hans. the strength of the Hans is not fighting but instead governning. the Strengths of those 3 i have mentioned are in fighting a war but terrible in governning.

Do you mean that the Hans are natural born rulers ?

The Han Chinese from the north very strange to say many of them since historical days are very polical. Many of the North Han Chinese are strong in governning. However the Han Chinese of the South on the other hand are very strong in doing business. the majority of the South Han Chinese very extremely business minded people. During the last dynasty of China when Chinese were exported and sold to nations outside, the majority of them were from the south, and among them, the most were the cantonese. Those Chinese today in the west ( Europe and US) are mostly Cantonese. Their ancestors came from Canton back then. In Asia for the Chinese,  people of Hong Kong and Macau are cantonese. the people of Taiwan are Hokkiens or so call MIN NAN people. the people in Thailand in particular are Teochews. People in Malaysia is very well mixed between the hokkiens and cantonese but they are more cantonese speaking. the majority of the people in Singapore are hokkiens. as to the other parts of Asia the majorities of the chinese there are also cantonese. perhaps in some sense you just might be correct that these people natural rulers or businessman.

Is this guy a Chinese Ivkhan or what? 😀

Maybe the Bulgarians were also Chinese?

as far as concern, Bulgarians are not chinese. but there are many nations that has been heavily mixed with chinese blood during their ancestor's days. on Asia itself, there are many nations in which their race/enthnic group is not as pure. many of them is very mixed. those that is very pure or so called original is very rare. these nations are such as philippines, Thailand, Myanmar(Burma) Laos, and Turkey. the people of philippines before any other thing in the event of history that took place was once very pure. but towards a later stage people from what we today call as indonesia wanted to conquer this nation. the renants of the song dynasty chinese who were escaping from the mongols landed in this land. from escapist, they became the invaders and established the LUZON empire. throughout this period of time from the rise to fall, the race of the philippines were very heavily and extremely mixed with chinese blood already. towards a later stage, the next blood to mix this race further was from Brunei, but this transition was very short. in no time, the spanish mixed their blood with this race , followed by the american during the colonia period and finally came in the Japanese. In all, how many groups of people and blood has already been mixed into this race? count it on your own. this is why when you look at the fillipino people, somewhat in terms of their facial features and skin colour, they can look very Chinese or Malay but at the same time very european. this is the reason behind to why. The people of Myanmar has the blood of the following mixed into them with their original natives ( Chinese from Yunan, Chinese from Tibet, Nepal people, India people, and some numbers of Thai people)Thai people known as the Siamese are also very mixed ( South Han Chinese from China, and some from Burma that mixed with the original locals and a large number of people from Laos)The people of Laos (a very large number of South China chinese which mixed with the natives.)The Huns were the ancestors of the Mongols. As i have earlier mentioned, Huns are a group of Chinese as well. These Chinese were from the north that move into the plains and became into normads. These Huns travel alot back then and most people have records of them seen and spoted in central Asia. however, they shifted into the middle east. Turkey this nation had not existed yet. but their ancestors were the Huns who established the Hunnic Empire and as to the fall of the roman empire, half of it contributions was because of the Huns in which Atilia had the most merits. In the later stage after the Hunnic empire was no more, it was some time later that the renants regroup themselves and eventually led to the establishement and rise of the Ottaman Empire. Finally after sometime, from the Ottaman Empire, it was rename and known as the nation of Turkey. In the whole process and transistion of everything, much blood has been mixed. that is why to many people they always wonder why Turks somewhat look like middle east Asian and somewhat Europeans?We do have a friend from Turkey here right? Pls do correct me if what i know is wrong about Turkey.

where else other chinese such as the Mongols,

That's a little offensive and very arrogant.Mongols and indeed Uygurs in Sincan (Xinjiang) are not chinese. The Former is an independant state and an entirely different nation whereas the latters are an ethnic Turkic tribe who are currently Chinese citizens.

Agreed, but Mongolia isn't necessarily "independent."  China and Russia have used it as a buffer between them, and Mongolia depends on them for imported goods etc....  Their independence is illusory at best.

Actually , basically to say all people who are yellow are chinese ! one of their ancestors was a chinese.  be it Koreans, Japanese, Mongols, Vietnamese etc... they are all of chinese origins when it comes to ancestry. Vietnamese are Cantonese Chinese. there was once a NANYUE kingdom in the south. this kingdom was a Cantonese Chinese Empire. it occupied terrians of Yunnan, guangdong, guangzhou, guangxi  and an extremely very large portion of north vietnam. it existed somewhere during and in between the Qin dynasty to 3 kindgoms period of China. after the fall of this kingdom, it become into 4 groups of people of 4 languages and one of them was the Vietnamese people. As to the Japanese, China created the existance of Japan. withouth China there will be no Japan existing today even. during the Qin dynasty, the first emperor of China, Qin Shihuang was a very brutal and tyrant emperor. he was the one who unify china as one. he was also one of those who is most afriad of death and he started the project of his tomb since the day he became emperor. there are too many legends and myths and stories of  immortality during that time. he had  a little ambition. he wanted to live forever and rule china ethernally. one day there was some news and rumors of immortality in some far away islands to the east. hence he dispacted 1000 men and woman to that island. when those men and woman arrived there, they refused to returnthey erased their identity that they are chinese and called themselves by a new group known as Japanese. that land is the land of rising sun known as Japan from that day onwards. as to Korea wise, it has been said that they were a bunch of chinese who were war prisoners, convicts, escapists, refugues and rebells who migrated to that land and settled down there. their blood has been mixed with much Kithians and Manchurains in the process of history as well. as to the mongols wise, they are definately Chinese ! before the Qin dynasty, the Han Chinese were not yet called as Hans. it was during the Han dynasty that the Chinese called themselves as Han Chinese. back then before the Qin dynasty, a group of the future to be Hans went north and settled down. they were nomads and called themselves as Xiongnu (Huns) at a much later stage, this group of people became the Mongols. during the Ming dynasty, the entire mongolia was conquered and became part of China. outer mongolia only gain independence through Russia's help at a later stage of time in history. be it by left or by right whichever the case is, Mongols are Chinese!

Dear Kentaoshima`, I wouldn't look offensive but your history of China and its neighbours seems to be a bit biased. Moreover Singapore seceded from the Malaysian federation and became an independent republic in 1965. Not mention the Sino-Vietnamese war of 1979, Tibet in 1950, the Sino-Indian war of 1962, and the latest controversies... I hope you'll bring more precisions.(Btw, I've found an interesting report from the Pacific Rim Cultural Foundation wherein they compare wars and ... religion as well !!surprising ...  :- )http://www.visualstatistics.net/Readings/Chinese%20Wars/Chinese%20wars.html

After most of the countries gain their independence from the British, the british has left too many undefine territorial issues behind unresolved for their commonwealth. the War between india and china is because of the british's undefine territorial borders issue that they have left behind for india to resolved it out with China. at the earlier days, China was too weak and poor but had never ever in the first place agreed to the border territorial issue with india. India ignored china's feelings and decisions on the matter and assumed that china has agreed. The british on the other hand simply hack care to what the 2 have decided and concluded. towards the more recent days, because of the earlier unresolved issue, renegociation took place and when there was no agreement a war broke off. if you look at this point to some sense, the british back then did not do a good job before they left. it is not just China and India. Singapore also have border and territorial issues with malaysia as well. there is some very tiny piece of land inside of singapore which belong to malaysia. for several years , singapore has been very hard to accuqiure back those land inside of singapore from malaysia with the means of money and others but to failure so far. there are also many more other nation with alot of territorial and border issue unresolved with their neigbours beisides those i have mentioned. as to those civil wars in tibet and Xinjiang. somehow it is seperatist movements. too many people and nations wish to seperate and make china smaller. previously in the past for Taiwan, Japan and USA are among those who gave the biggest support to them to fight for independence and to become a 2nd China. this was that anger china as to them there can only be 1 china.as to what i have understand from people that i have know of both living inside and outside of china, the minorities have actually been given many privilledges or so called special treatment is some sense. but those people still keep claim that they are being discriminated and did not appreciate the goodness done and given to them. If you truly understand the culture, characteristics and history of the HAN chinese, they are peace makers. they are not war minded. they are friendly. where else other chinese such as the Mongols, Manchurians, Kithians etc... they are very super War minded and can fight a war better than the Hans. the strength of the Hans is not fighting but instead governning. the Strengths of those 3 i have mentioned are in fighting a war but terrible in governning. in fact China to my opinion as too much to learn from singapore. Singapore is very and extremely successful in achiving racial harmony. they have almost any type of people that you can name of and think that exists in this world living there together with others peacefully. they have also many types of religion and there is not much of a clash there. China should learn from the success of singapore on how singapore did it and try to achieve better than singapore. if they don't most likely things will still continue as it is now. do try look things from 2 sides instead of one, my friend.

Russia is definitely European as most of its population base resides in the European continent.Turkey is also European/Mediterranean having its history tied to European affairs throughout the Seljuk and Ottoman periods, and even today hopes for inclusion into the European Union.Papau New Guinea is Polynesian, but I would argue the most "Asian" of the three you listed.Australia and New Zealand are "European" since they were colonized by Europeans but they are their own continent anyway so that point is moot.

but actually Australia and New Zeland were orignally not a nations of the Whites. it was the native's land and the white snatch it over from them. most likely if i am not mistaken the natives from this 2 lands are probably the same as those in Papua new guinea (PNG). the people in PNG somewhat or somehow has some relations with the tribes of Indonesia. Why is it that Turkey wishes to join Europe? Is it due to because they are muslim country and part of the middle east and that their ancestors were the HUNS which orginated from Mongolia and China that they are being labeled as Asia?As to Russia wise, I have noticed that their traditional buildings in terms of design and structures as compared to the others in europe, they are less european to me. in fact i don't even get am european feeling about the buildings of Russia. Instead i get a very strong feeling of the Russian traditional buildings that it is so very muslim. I really don know their buildings gives me this feeling