• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

WCF

History, politics, and culture articles and forum discussions.

You are here: Home

Lujack

  • Profile
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 14, 2009 at 3:01 am in reply to: Most underrated General #6011
    Lujack
    Participant

    It would have to be George Thomas, I think.  He was one of the most capable army commanders in the war, saved the Army of the Cumberland at Chickamauga, and finished off Hood in Tennessee in 1864.  Everyone forgets him, despite the fact that he was behind only Grant, Sherman, and Meade in the Union Army's seniority at the end of the war.

    May 14, 2009 at 2:58 am in reply to: Lincoln wanted Gettysburg to be the end #8991
    Lujack
    Participant

    For Meade though, it wasn't so much the right decision not to pursue (and he did pursue, as best he could), but the only decision he could make.  The I Corps was exhausted, the XI Corps was broken and demoralized, and the III Corps had been absolutely shattered.  Both the I and the III Corps would be merged into other corps, and the XI Corps would be transferred west, never to fight with the AoP again.In terms of commanders, Reynolds was dead and John Newton, unproven in corps command, was running what was left of the I Corps.  Sickles had lost a leg.  The V Corps had been committed piecemeal, and had lost more than a few of its brigade commanders.Meade had three intact corps: the II, the VI, and the XII.  The XII Corps was under the command of Slocum, who Meade had no confidence in at all, and was notorious for slowness.  The II had fought hard and was pretty tired, but more than that, they'd lost Hancock on the third day of the fighting.  All that was really left was the VI Corps under Sedgwick.In order to even think about mounting a major attack on Lee, Meade would have needed to rearrange his army's structure on the fly.  He really did all that he could.

    May 14, 2009 at 2:50 am in reply to: Biggest social change in 19th Century #8852
    Lujack
    Participant

    You can't really separate the two like that.  The Industrial Revolution drove the Civil War; the Civil War helped spread the Industrial Revolution throughout the country.After all, a Southern victory in the Civil War meant that the agrarian society of the South would have still been profitable for another generation or so.  That would significantly delay the industrial revolution in the South, and it would have a radically different character (being manned by slaves or slaves-in-all-but-name) when it happened.

    May 14, 2009 at 2:47 am in reply to: Communism in Alabama during the Great Depression #15117
    Lujack
    Participant

    The theory of communism speaks to people that want something for nothing, or should I say people's innate laziness.  That is its appeal.  The problem with the communist approach is that Marx and Engels never really specified what happens after the establishment of the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat”.  They seemed to assume that everyone would pull together out of a sense of brotherly love.  Marx was long on pithy slogans but short on practical ideas of governance.

    I sincerely doubt that this was the case.  After all, the communists and socialists were strongest among the farmers and laborers; not people who led lazy lives.  What the communists and socialists promised was a more radical, faster, and easier way towards the just society that the Populists, Progressives, and the New Dealers were seeking.If you notice, the communists and socialists were at their strongest when liberal movements like the Populists, the Progressives, and then the New Deal seemed to stall.  In other words, they turned to the more radical party because the moderate movements didn't seem to be getting where they said they'd go.  Whenever those movements enjoyed a major success or had a charismatic leader like William Jennings Bryan, the more radical parties weakened again.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 47
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Login

Log In
Register Lost Password

Blog Categories

Search blog articles

Before Footer

  • Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?

    Julian the Apostate stands as an enigmatic figure among Roman emperors, ascending to power in 361 AD …

    Read More

    Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?
  • The Babylonian Bride

    Marriage customs in Ancient Babylon Ancient Babylonia was a society, which, although it did not …

    Read More

    The Babylonian Bride
  • The fall of Athens

    In 407 B.C. and again in 405 B.C.. the Spartans in alliance with their old enemies, the Persians, …

    Read More

    The fall of Athens

Footer

Posts by topic

2016 Election Alexander Hamilton American Revolution archaeology Aristotle Ben Franklin Black Americans Charles Dickens Christianity Christmas Constantine Custer's Last Stand Egypt email engineering England forum security Founding Fathers France future history George Washington Germany Greece hacker Hitler Industrial Revolution Ireland James Madison Jewish medieval military history Paleolithic philosophy pilgrimage Rome Russia SEO Slavery Socrates spammer technology Trump World War I World War II Year In Review

Recent Topics

  • Midsummer Night: June 25th
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Did Julian the Apostate’s plan ever have a chance?
  • Release of the JFK Files
  • What was the greatest military advancement of all time?

RSS Ancient News

Recent Forum Replies

  • Going to feature old posts
  • What’s new?
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Testing out a new feature
  • Testing out a new feature

Copyright © 2025 · Contact