Who are you going to fight? If there is no conspiracy to take your liberty going on, what have you to prep for? I'm confused.
It is called preparedness for preparedness's sake. You could also call it not taking freedom for granted. But then, I did voluntarily put my life on the line in service to my country. If I were to be really offensive I would say that nobody who has not voluntarily risked their lives for others even has a right to be having this conversation. A foxhole is a very different place than in front of a computer spouting off about chem-trails the trilateral and such. Of course, I am not saying that though.
No army has ever won without the support of the people.
Rome, the Bolsheviks, Just about every Medieval Army, and most ancient ones. Try something better than that. Or better yet, admit that you might be wrong on this.
How much do you want to bet that the producers find a way to spice things up so that the historians/actors make Da Vinci Codesque "discoveries" involving scandal or intrigue during the course of the shooting?
Well then it would be theater and not history wouldn't it? I mean really, how thrilling is it to research in archives and write papers?
I just find it amusing that anybody thinks either side of the political divide has a lock on legislating morality. Isn't legislating morality at the heart of law itself? Laws are strictures defined to codify what the ruler or majority thinks is morally acceptable and to punish those that break that moral code. At least that is the way I see it. I make no comment either way about whether I think the changes in law in America recently are drifting in a direction I dislike or approve of, I am simply stating a belief about the nature of law itself.
A fully armed and dangerous lamb at that and you will not find me in the slaughterhouse. That would be pacifists and cowards that will end up there because they are too proud or whatever to fight for their liberty. I don't want to start a fight or flame war or anything so will now bow out.
No war is waged on rational calculations and the belief that one side is in the right. We may hope for victory but we do not count on it. Good armies make their own luck and must not count on hope to deliver victory to them.
The list is a grab bag of conspiracy theorist and libertarian talking points that I am almost convinced is not meant to be serious. Here is my take:1. You know there’s no meaningful difference between major political parties (Democrats and Republicans): This is largely true from the perspective of the average person but fundamental differences remain between the parties that are often brushed under the rug and/or dismissed by those making this charge.2. You understand that the Federal Reserve, or international central banking more broadly, is the engine of our economic problems: If this point is not straight out of Ayn Rand nothing is. The loony right love to go off about the danger of fiat currency and it's accompanying built-in inflation and they have some good points. However, the real root of our problems is people both rich, not so rich, and poor making stupid decisions without adequate analysis of possible consequences The Fed is not responsible for the housing bubble, college debt, or consumer debt; individuals are.3. You know that preemptive war is never necessary: I am obviously going to disagree with this one as it is false on its own merits. If done properly and with sufficient violence of execution preemptive war is a very good tool in the nation's toolbox.4. You know that you’re being systematically poisoned, how, by whom, and why: I read this and immediately thought of the conspiracy theorists telling us that Fluoride in the water is not for healthy teeth but for mind control and all the idiots that say modern food processing and production methods are killing us. This is the same group responsible for the return of the Whooping Cough because they refuse to have their children immunized.5. You understand that government can never legislate morality, nor should they: Isn't it conservatives who are largely trying to do this now in response to the Democrats successful efforts at same over the past 50+ years? Conservatives are losing the battle for the soul of America and rather than try and compete with the materialism and narcissism of the left in the battle of ideas they are now trying to legislate their morality into practice. Shouldn't we as conservatives spend more time trying to show and convince people that leftist post-modernism is destructive of a functioning society and win that battle among the people where it counts instead of wailing about how the media and government is against us. I think I remember such efforts at convincing being called witnessing. It seems to me that most conservatives and religious spend an inordinate amount of time being righteous about how good they are instead of trying to show others how fulfilling the correct moral path can be.6. You know that the mainstream media is wholly owned and manipulated by the ruling elite: This is true yet a trope at this point that makes people start to ignore you as soon as you bring it up.7. You know that your neighbors are not your enemy even if you have fierce ideological disagreements: My neighbor can indeed be my enemy and we should not forget this but at the same time we should not let that recognition of it color everything we do. Conservative and progressive ideology are incompatible and all we can do is convert progressives, they are certainly not amenable to enlightenment.8. You know that the endgame is one-world control of planet Earth: Is it even really necessary to mention how the NWO crowd has discredited themselves in the eyes of the majority? Anyone that is too strident about anything will be ignored by all except fellow travelers and the NWO meme is no different from anything else.9. You recognize that there are esoteric powers manipulating our physical world: This part turns off everyone who is not a person of faith. Is it not possible to be both enlightened and awake without going to church on Sunday?10. The power to change the world rests with you and you alone: BS, the power to change the world rests with those in control of the levers of power. Only if conservatives can get and keep control of the levers of state power can we begin the process of changing the world for real.Let the hate and disdain begin. I will pit my realism against the kind of conservative libertarian messianic thought in this list every day of the week because in the end it is only realism that will bring America and the world back onto a moral path. Remember, the Jews are still waiting for the Messiah that appeared 2,00 years ago to come because they are too blind to see that he has come and gone and they missed the boat.
I have to disagree here. I believe Lee already knew the war was a foregone conclusion even as early as 1863, but he hoped to strike a political blow in the North that would topple Lincoln and cause Northern support for the war to falter.
Hope is not a strategy as many people more famous than me have pointed out.
I did not find the facts interesting. Indeed, his list of factoids actually appears to be a selected pulling of numbers and incidents from the Wikipedia article on the war. It is essentially just common historical knowledge that has been repackaged.