I don't have as much a problem with the "public exception" to reading the suspect his Miranda rights.  I believe that is an exception which has already been in place and has been reviewed by the courts and found to be constitutional.  I have more of a problem with making up new laws or exceptions on the spot in response to events than laws which have been enacted and put into place before situations arise.

And that's exactly what they are doing.  I'm the one coming up with exceptions or new laws.  I do think it will be impossible for any court to strip an American-born citizen of his citizenship because it's by birth.  Since it was a court that gave this guy his citizenship, then a court can take it away and it wouldn't set any new precedent.  Since this "public exception" seems to be such a problem for everyone, then just do that.  The guy is a jihadist and an enemy combatant.  There is no doubt in my mind and he should be treated as such.  Like I said, these people are using our Constitution against us and we cannot let them do this.  How do you think they infiltrate the country? By using student Visa and becoming naturalized that's how. Making any exceptions for Islamic terrorists is not a slippery slope.  If anything, it protects our rights more. 

Because Tea Partiers don't blow up people at marathons. Anything the SPLC has to say doesn't stand a chance in any court.  I dislike the ACLU, but they will be the first ones to defend this “hate group” garbage.I'm not tearing up the Constitution, I'm tearing up this PC crap.  Would questioning the Imam in every **** Mosque in this country be a violation of the 1st or would it be considered an anti-terrorism measure?  I vote for the latter.  They hide behind and use our Constitution against us because in our muticultural sensitivity we let them.  Profiling, questioning, and investigating them is not violating their religious freedom.  We are not saying they can't practice their religion nor are we shutting them down.  Where is that radical cleric at Northeatern? Where is the leader of the mosque in Boston where one if not both of the terrorists attended or once attended? Are they in custody or have they even been questioned?  My guess is no. 

How do you know whether or not he's been read his rights?How do you know if this kid is even conscience?  He was in critical condition.Even if they don't read Miranda to him, he still has those rights.LE's first job is to see if he had more bombs planted. Not to convict him, but for public safety. Let's say he planted another bomb at Northeastern. He gives the authorities that information, they find it and defuse it, THEN they read him his rights and charge him for it.  If he's never read his rights, then I might have a problem with that. If they are questioning him to get information of more immediate imminent danger, than no I do not.

If Odumbo showed as much fortitude and anger towards Islamists as he does Republicans, he could actually be a pretty good president.But I doubt this will happen. It's back to disarming Americans, forcing Catholics to hand out free abortion pills,  and marrying queers.  That's more of a threat to him, the Left, and most Democrats than anything else.

Quote from Freerepublic:"The almost non existent Obama during all this will suddenly show up and parade all the cops and investigators involved with this terror strike around DC town. The Media will gush about how well Obammy handled this situation, just like he had been there and caught the guy himself! Comparisons will be made between Bush's 9/11 and Obammys. Then the media "analysis" of what is wrong with America and how it turned an innocent little boy into a radical."Sadly, I think this is what we'll be hearing from the media, especially that last sentence.  All I know is I followed the pursuit, but I am not at all interested in hearing the "analysis" of these two.Will they profile Muslims now? NopeWill the raid the mosque where that first dead terrorist attended in Boston? Nope.Will they now admit that Muslims hate America? NopeAll we'll be hearing is that not all Muslims are like this blah blah blah and that the war between Islam and everyone else is everyone else's fault.

Question now becomes - was it a religiously-motivated attack, or a politically-motivated one?

If it's Islamic in nature it's both because Islam can't separate the two.My guess is he was influenced by his older brother who seems quite the jihadist according to his personal online records.And I think the reason they locked the city is because this is a terrorist cell of more than 2 involved.  They know something. I'm betting there are bombs or threats of bombs planted throughout the city. Why would they be doing a controlled explosion in a heavily populated street in Cambridge of the second kids apartment?  They evacuated UMASS Dartmouth, which is no where near Boston, to checkout the kids dorm.Either that, or they are embarrassed because a whole police force and then some let a 19 year kid escape from their grasp.I can understand if it was only the area where these two were intitially found but I'm surprised so many people are cooperating.  Some of the pics of downtown Boston today are eerie and apocalyptic looking.  Boston strong? No more like Boston sheep.  Maybe if they let the people out, they would find the kid. Or perhaps I should start listening to Alex Jones more and become more of a conspiracy theorist. Maybe this was a test by the Obama administration to show how easy it is for the Federal government law enforcement to takeover a major city.

They say it is. I'm only going by reports.  He was run over. No bomb on him, but he had a detonator.South Station on lockdown (biggest transportation hub in Boston)